Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs BMW iX2 – Which car suits you better?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or BMW iX2?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the BMW iX2 costs 43100 £. That’s a price difference of around 9943 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the BMW iX2: with 15.30 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.50 kWh.
As for range, the BMW iX2 performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 478 km, about 98 km more than the Alpine A290.
iX2
@ BMW Group Press
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX2 has a distinct edge – offering 313 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX2 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.60 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW iX2 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW iX2 pulls noticeable stronger with 494 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 194 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is evident lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1960 kg. The difference is around 481 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW iX2 offers clearly perceptible more room – 525 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 199 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW iX2 performs noticeable better – up to 1400 L, which is about 294 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, BMW iX2 slight takes the win – 510 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the BMW iX2 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £43,100
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX2
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
BMW iX2
The BMW iX2 stands out with its distinctive design and forward-thinking technology, making it a captivating choice for those interested in luxury electric vehicles. Its spacious interior and cutting-edge features offer both comfort and innovation, providing an exceptional driving experience. With a commitment to sustainability, this model is not just a statement of style but also an embodiment of the future of eco-conscious driving.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Alpine A290
BMW iX2
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
43100 - 54800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 - 16.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 478 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
64.80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1960 - 2095 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
525 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4554 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1845 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1560 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1400 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
500 - 510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 313 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 230 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
BMW
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.