Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Kia Niro – Which one offers the better deal?
Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Kia Niro.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Kia Niro has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 4037 £.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs decisively better – achieving up to 380 km, about 318 km more than the Kia Niro.
Niro
@ Kia Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a a bit edge – offering 218 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs slight better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls somewhat stronger with 300 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Niro is hardly perceptible lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1479 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Kia Niro offers noticeable more room – 451 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1445 L, which is about 339 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 minimal takes the win – 471 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Alpine A290 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Alpine A290 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £33,200
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Kia Niro
The Kia Niro presents itself as a versatile and eco-friendly SUV, blending a stylish design with advanced hybrid technology. Its spacious interior offers comfort and practicality, making it ideal for both city driving and longer journeys. With a focus on efficiency and sustainability, the Niro is a compelling choice for environmentally conscious drivers.
details
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
@ Kia Corporation
Alpine A290
Kia Niro
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Kia Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4420 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1825 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1545 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Kia
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.