VS

Alpine A290 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Mazda CX-6e?

Alpine A290 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Alpine A290

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter

Mazda CX-6e

  • slightly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 is visibly cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,677 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Alpine A290 is slightly more efficient: consuming 15.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 3.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e offers clearly more range – reaching up to 484 km, about 104 km more than the Alpine A290.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e offers slightly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A290 delivers only slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is significantly lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 651 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers clearly more boot space – 468 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 142 L.

When it comes to payload, the Alpine A290 carries very slightly more – 396 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 364 - 380 km
Alpine A290
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
Alpine A290
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
3,990 mm
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
1,520 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,106 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.