VS

CUPRA Tavascan vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Tavascan or Mazda CX-6e?

CUPRA Tavascan vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-6e

details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Tavascan

Quick take: CUPRA Tavascan VS Mazda CX-6e

CUPRA Tavascan VS Mazda CX-6e are two very different approaches to the modern electric SUV, one leaning into sporty design and long‑distance efficiency while the other emphasizes comfort, equipment and everyday practicality. The CUPRA Tavascan sells itself on presence, a hushed motorway demeanor and a big, usable boot, at a premium price and with a coupe‑SUV silhouette that changes how the cabin feels. The Mazda CX‑6e pitches a calmer, slightly more traditional SUV experience: abundant standard kit, a broad panoramic display and packaging that favours ease of ownership and a reassuring warranty. Where the Tavascan promises more dynamic thrust and a longer real‑world reach, the CX‑6e trades outright pace for simpler usability, a front storage compartment and a friendlier running cost story. Pick between attitude and touring competence with the Tavascan, or measured comfort and sensible value with the CX‑6e.

CX-6e

Driving character and on-road behaviour

CUPRA Tavascan drives with a firmer, more engaged character — steering is precise and the chassis rewards a brisk pace without feeling twitchy. That extra pep translates into stronger acceleration and a sensation of effortless overtaking that the Mazda CX‑6e doesn't aim to match; the CX‑6e feels deliberately composed and more reserved in its power delivery. Brake feel and the interplay between regenerative braking and the mechanical pedal are areas where Tavascan sometimes unsettles drivers, whereas the CX‑6e focuses on smoothness and predictable responses. If you want sharper responses and a car that feels eager on on‑ramps, the Tavascan leans that way; if you prefer a settled, relaxed cruiser that masks weight and speed changes, the CX‑6e is the safer bet.

Tavascan

Comfort and long-distance use

On long runs the CUPRA Tavascan impresses with very low cabin noise and a chassis that soaks motorway disturbances when fitted with adaptive damping, making extended trips feel effortless. However, the coupe roofline and optional large wheels can compress rear headroom and introduce firmer ride moments that undercut its touring promise for tall passengers. The Mazda CX‑6e is quieter in its approach to comfort: seats, suspension and a roomy front cabin create a relaxed environment that is forgiving over hours on the road. You will notice the CX‑6e tends to use a touch more energy at sustained high speeds than the Tavascan, which matters on long runs where charging rhythm becomes part of the trip plan. Put simply, the Tavascan is the more refined long‑distance machine if you value silence and efficiency, while the CX‑6e trades a touch of range efficiency for broader comfort and convenience.

Practicality, cargo and day-to-day usability

Practical life with the CUPRA Tavascan benefits from a larger, well‑shaped boot and a higher payload allowance that make it better suited to family luggage and weekend kit. Be aware that the coupe profile eats into some rear headspace and there is no front trunk to stash smaller items, so loading choices are more concentrated at the rear. Mazda CX‑6e counters with an 83‑litre front storage compartment that adds usable flexibility and clever day‑to‑day storage despite a smaller rear boot. The CX‑6e also offers sensible towing capability and a very complete equipment list that reduces the need for aftermarket accessories. If cargo volume and carrying capacity are priorities the Tavascan edges ahead, but for organised, checklist‑based family life the CX‑6e's frunk and kit can feel smarter.

City friendliness, visibility and infotainment

In town the CUPRA Tavascan is easier to hustle into tight turns thanks to a compact turning circle and light steering, yet its small rear window and absent wiper make manoeuvres and parking more reliant on cameras. Mazda CX‑6e's broad body makes narrow streets and old city garages feel tighter, but excellent camera systems and a head‑up display help offset the width penalty. Both cars embrace large screens, but their philosophies differ: the Tavascan mixes tactile controls with touch sliders that can feel fiddly, while the CX‑6e centralises almost everything on an expansive display and gesture controls that some find distracting. Practically speaking, the Tavascan rewards drivers who prefer a tactile driving feel and can live with camera reliance, whereas the CX‑6e is geared toward buyers who want tech to simplify low‑speed tasks despite a learning curve.

Buyer fit — who should test which car next

Which car suits you depends on priorities: choose the CUPRA Tavascan if you want a standout design, stronger on‑road punch and the most efficient long‑distance companion in this pair. Opt for the Mazda CX‑6e if you prize a richer standard equipment package, a roomy and reassuringly finished cabin and little extras like a front locker and lengthy warranty. Both will cover daily needs well, but their trade‑offs — Tavascan's limited peak charging pace and coupe roof versus CX‑6e's display‑led operation and initial lack of all‑wheel drive — determine which compromises you accept. Below this editorial we unpack the technical detail that explains those behavioural differences so you can match figures to the everyday impressions that matter to you on a test drive.

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tavascan

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

CUPRA Tavascan is barely cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 77 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the CUPRA Tavascan is visibly more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the CUPRA Tavascan offers slightly more range – reaching up to 557 km, about 73 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Tavascan offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Tavascan is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the CUPRA Tavascan delivers considerably more torque with 545 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 255 Nm more.

Tavascan

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Tavascan is very slightly lighter – 2,096 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Tavascan offers somewhat more boot space – 540 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Tavascan carries noticeably more – 518 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 133 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The CUPRA Tavascan is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
Tavascan

CUPRA Tavascan

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 557 km
details
CUPRA Tavascan
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Tavascan

The Cupra Tavascan blends athletic styling with a premium, driver-focused cabin, giving the electric crossover a distinctly sporty character. It feels poised and engaging on the road while standing out with bold design cues and a modern, high-quality finish.

details
89C3E534-A830-42FA-86CC-BA89F47CCA5A
E1499BC5-9624-4D31-A93B-93D1887B3824
2C084747-FC5E-41F7-84AE-11FE7F54C046

Reviews CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
David
25 Apr 2026, 10:57:49

Both are very good. The range and energy consumption is beter in the cupra. The cupra is also more responsive and it handles beter. The Kia is more spacious and slightly beter tech wise. The Kia is more a family car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Raval
VS
Choosing between the CUPRA Tavascan and the CUPRA Raval means weighing two different takes on style, technology and driving character from the same performance-focused brand. This comparison will cover driving dynamics, range and charging, interior practicality, and overall value so you can pick …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
CUPRA Tavascan
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 50,500 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
441 - 557 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,096 - 2,273 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
540 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,861 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
507 - 518 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 545 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Tavascan?

The CUPRA Tavascan is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.