Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Skoda Enyaq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alpine A290 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4886 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.
As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – achieving up to 587 km, about 207 km more than the Alpine A290.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Enyaq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 523 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more room – 585 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 259 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs distinct better – up to 1710 L, which is about 604 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq minimal takes the win – 509 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Enyaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
detailsThe Škoda Enyaq represents a bold step for the Czech manufacturer, embracing a stylish design and environmental consciousness with its electric powertrain. Inside, the cabin offers a blend of comfort and advanced technology, creating a modern driving experience. With its spacious interior and practical features, the Enyaq is perfect for families or anyone looking for a practical yet luxurious electric vehicle.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.