@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Alpine A290 vs Skoda Enyaq – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Skoda Enyaq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £. That’s a price difference of around 4886 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.

As for range, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – achieving up to 587 km, about 207 km more than the Alpine A290.

Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Enyaq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 523 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more room – 585 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 259 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs distinct better – up to 1710 L, which is about 604 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq minimal takes the win – 509 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Enyaq proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Enyaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £38,100
Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 428 - 587 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Skoda Enyaq

5 (3)
rate

The Škoda Enyaq represents a bold step for the Czech manufacturer, embracing a stylish design and environmental consciousness with its electric powertrain. Inside, the cabin offers a blend of comfort and advanced technology, creating a modern driving experience. With its spacious interior and practical features, the Enyaq is perfect for families or anyone looking for a practical yet luxurious electric vehicle.

details
Alpine A290
Skoda Enyaq
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Enyaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
38100 - 52200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4658 - 4660 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1879 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
457 - 509 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Skoda
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.