Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Skoda Enyaq?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alpine A290 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4886 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – achieving up to 587 km, about 207 km more than the Alpine A290.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Enyaq performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1554 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 448 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers significantly more room – 585 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 259 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs distinct better – up to 1710 L, which is about 604 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq noticeable takes the win – 509 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 113 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Alpine A290
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.