@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
VS

Alpine A290 vs Skoda Kodiaq – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 3677 £.

As for range, the Alpine A290 performs clearly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 257 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a a bit edge – offering 265 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 61 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is a bit lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 205 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 584 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs decisively better – up to 2105 L, which is about 999 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq somewhat takes the win – 545 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £36,800
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
Alpine A290
Skoda Kodiaq
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Skoda
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.