Compare performance (325 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (35,600 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Vauxhall Grandland or Skoda Kodiaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving landscape of SUVs, the Vauxhall Grandland and Skoda Kodiaq have carved out prominent positions, appealing to families and adventure enthusiasts alike. This article delves into a head-to-head comparison of these two formidable contenders, examining their technical specs, innovations, and overall appeal.
The Vauxhall Grandland, at 4650 mm in length, presents a stylish yet robust exterior, measuring 1934 mm in width and 1665 mm in height. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq takes a slightly longer stance with a length of up to 4761 mm, a width of 1864 mm, and a height range reaching up to 1683 mm, offering more headroom and a commanding road presence.
Both models offer diverse engine options. Vauxhall stakes its claim with petrol mild hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and all-electric powertrains, outputting up to 213 HP and a maximum torque of 350 Nm. The Grandland's all-electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 585 km, ideal for eco-conscious drivers.
Skoda, on the other hand, offers a mix of plug-in hybrids, petrol MHEV, diesel, and traditional petrol engines. With its most powerful version delivering 265 HP, the Kodiaq's powertrains emphasize versatility, tailored for both urban commuting and spirited drives, thanks to its available all-wheel drive option.
Focusing on efficiency, the Grandland's plug-in hybrid claims a consumption as low as 0.8 L/100 km and zero emissions in its electric mode. Its CO2 efficiency class ranges from A to B, embodying its commitment to environmental sustainability.
The Kodiaq hybrid models are equally impressive, with fuel consumption dipping as low as 0.4 L/100 km. The Skoda also impresses with an electric range of up to 123 km, supported by a 19.7 kWh battery, pushing the boundaries of hybrid efficiency.
Inside, both SUVs prioritize comfort with spacious seating for five. However, the Kodiaq edges ahead with superior trunk capacity ranging from 745 to 910 liters, accommodating those extra bags for long journeys. The Grandland offers a respectable 550 liters, balancing between passenger and cargo space.
Modern SUVs demand cutting-edge technology, and both vehicles deliver. The Vauxhall Grandland comes equipped with a suite of safety features, including advanced driver assistance systems that enhance road safety and driving confidence.
Similarly, the Skoda Kodiaq incorporates state-of-the-art technology with multiple driver assistance features and infotainment options, tailored to provide an engaging and secure driving experience for all occupants.
Choosing between the Vauxhall Grandland and the Skoda Kodiaq depends on individual preferences and driving needs. The Grandland is perfect for environmentally conscious urban drivers seeking a nimble, efficient experience with electric options.
In contrast, the Kodiaq stands out for those who prioritize space and long-distance comfort with a penchant for versatility, thanks to its larger trunk space and diverse engine lineup. Whichever you choose, these SUVs represent the pinnacle of automotive innovation, promising an engaging drive in 2024.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Vauxhall Grandland is only slightly cheaper – starting at 35,600 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,263 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Vauxhall Grandland with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Vauxhall Grandland offers substantially more range – reaching up to 694 km, about 572 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Grandland offers somewhat more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Grandland is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 6.1 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is markedly faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the Vauxhall Grandland tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 56 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Grandland delivers markedly more torque with 509 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 109 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Grandland is barely lighter – 1,675 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 9 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more boot space – 910 L compared to 550 L. That’s a difference of about 360 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 460 L more than the Vauxhall Grandland.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries moderately more – 563 kg compared to 495 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.
The Vauxhall Grandland holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Opel Grandland feels like a sensible, well-rounded SUV — neat styling, a spacious cabin and a composed ride that turns daily driving into a quietly pleasant experience. It’s a smart choice for buyers who want modern tech, good economy and a dash of German practicality without shouting for attention.
details
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,600 - 51,400 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
82 - 694 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,675 - 2,325 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
485 - 550 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4,650 mm
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
1,905 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
1,665 mm
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,645 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
425 - 495 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 509 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Vauxhall
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España