@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Alpine A290 vs Suzuki S-Cross – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or Suzuki S-Cross fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki S-Cross has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £, while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £. That’s a price difference of around 11409 £.

S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a decisively edge – offering 218 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 89 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Suzuki S-Cross takes 9.50 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Suzuki S-Cross performs a bit better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls noticeable stronger with 300 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is a bit lighter – 1280 kg compared to 1479 kg. The difference is around 199 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers clearly perceptible more room – 430 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Suzuki S-Cross performs to a small extent better – up to 1230 L, which is about 124 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 somewhat takes the win – 471 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Alpine A290 shows itself to be offers a more balanced package and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £33,200
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 16.5 kWh
  • Electric Range : 364 - 380 km
details

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Suzuki S-Cross

4.5 (2)
rate

The Suzuki S-Cross emerges as a versatile crossover, blending urban agility with a rugged presence suited for diverse terrains. Its design combines sleek, modern aesthetics with practicality, offering a spacious interior that comfortably accommodates passengers and cargo for varied journeys. Drivers will appreciate the advanced technology features that enhance both driving pleasure and safety, making the S-Cross a well-rounded option for those seeking reliability and style in a compact SUV.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_004 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_016 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_037 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_040 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki_S-Cross_049 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation
S-CROSS_innen2 @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

Miroljub 6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Top Car Comparisons

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Alpine A290
Suzuki S-Cross
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
S-Cross @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
21800 - 33700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
116 - 131 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1280 - 1435 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4300 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1785 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
375 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automated Manual, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
116 - 129 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.50 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 195 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
85 - 95 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Suzuki

Similar Comparisons

@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda HR-V
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Honda HR-V and Suzuki S-Cross stand out with their unique offerings. The HR-V impresses with its versatile interior and fuel-efficient performance, while the S-Cross boasts a more rugged design and off-road capability. Both vehicles cater to different …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Renault Captur or the Suzuki S-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Opel Frontera or the Suzuki S-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
Unsure whether the Suzuki S-Cross or the Dacia Bigster is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs bring unique strengths to the table. The S-Cross impresses with its spacious interior and robust performance, making it an ideal choice for family adventures. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross stands out for its urban …
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.