Compare performance (207 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (20000 £ vs 16600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A1 or Renault Clio?
In the ever-evolving landscape of hatchbacks, two contenders stand out: the Audi A1 and the Renault Clio. Both vehicles bring unique attributes and advanced features to the table, but which one should claim the top spot in your garage? Let’s delve into their technical aspects and innovations to help you make an informed decision.
The Audi A1 and Renault Clio are both crafted in the sleek and versatile hatchback design, making them perfect for navigating urban roads with style. The Audi A1 measures slightly shorter in length at 4046 mm compared to the Clio’s 4053 mm, but offers a width of up to 1756 mm. The Clio surpasses this with a broader stance at 1798 mm in width. When it comes to height, the A1 stands between 1409-1459 mm while the Clio is set at 1440 mm.
The Audi A1 boasts a variety of petrol engines, ranging from a modest 95 HP with a three-cylinder configuration to a robust 207 HP powered by a four-cylinder engine. The A1 reaches 100 km/h in a swift 6.5 seconds with the top model, showcasing its superior acceleration capabilities. Maximum speed varies from 182 to 245 km/h, depending on the engine choice.
On the other hand, the Renault Clio provides diverse powertrains, including Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG options. The Clio's engines offer between 67 and 143 HP, with the hybrid version reaching 100 km/h in 9.3 seconds. Its maximum speed peaks at 174 km/h, providing a suitable yet less dynamic performance in comparison to the A1.
Both vehicles feature front-wheel-drive systems, ensuring a smooth and controlled driving experience. The Audi A1 offers flexibility with both a Manual Gearbox and a sophisticated Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio provides the option of an Automatic Gearbox or a manual transmission, along with a CVT for more seamless driving.
Efficiency is a strong point for both cars, with the Renault Clio leading in fuel economy thanks to its hybrid model achieving an impressive 4.3 L/100km. The Audi A1’s consumption ranges from 5.3 to 6.5 L/100km, making it slightly less efficient but still commendable for its class. In terms of CO2 emissions, the Clio’s hybrid system delivers a competitive edge, emitting as low as 97 g/km. The A1 varies between 120 and 147 g/km, reflecting its broader engine range.
Both hatchbacks offer five-door configurations, providing easy access and family-friendliness. The Audi A1 features a trunk capacity of 335 liters, accommodating day-to-day luggage while the Clio can hold a slightly larger cargo with its 301 to 391 liters capacity, depending on the model.
The choice between the Audi A1 and Renault Clio ultimately depends on your priorities. If you seek a car with sporty performance options and striking design, the Audi A1 presents a high appeal. However, if efficiency and practicality take precedence, particularly with the eco-friendly hybrid option, the Renault Clio proves to be a compelling choice. Whichever vehicle you choose, both deliver reliable performance and innovation that any modern driver will appreciate.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Clio has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £ , while the Audi A1 costs 20000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3386 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.10 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Audi A1 with 5.20 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A1 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 207 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 49 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A1 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A1 pulls distinct stronger with 320 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 115 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Clio is minimal lighter – 1124 kg compared to 1175 kg. The difference is around 51 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Clio offers somewhat more room – 391 L compared to 335 L. That’s a difference of about 56 L.
When it comes to payload, Audi A1 hardly perceptible takes the win – 470 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.
The Audi A1 is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A1 is a compact premium hatch that wraps Audi's polished design and surprisingly grown-up cabin into a city-friendly package. It’s poised and fun to drive, a smart pick for buyers who want luxury flair without the fuss of a bigger car — and it makes tight parking feel almost enjoyable.
details
The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20000 - 28800 £
|
Price
16600 - 23700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
118 - 146 g/km
|
co2
92 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1175 - 1365 kg
|
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
335 L
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4053 - 4116 mm
|
|
Width
1740 - 1756 mm
|
Width
1768 - 1798 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1440 - 1451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1176 L
|
|
Payload
410 - 470 kg
|
Payload
398 - 463 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 207 HP
|
Power HP
67 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 11.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 17.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 320 Nm
|
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 152 kW
|
Power kW
49 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España