Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Audi A1 or Toyota Aygo?
In the bustling world of compact cars, two names often pop up: the Audi A1 and the Toyota Aygo. While both vehicles cater to the urban commuter, their approach to design, performance, and technology set them apart. Let’s delve into the specifics of these city-friendly cars.
The Audi A1's hatchback body is built for a more lavish visual appeal, aligning with Audi's premium image. It stretches over 4 meters in length, giving it a commanding presence despite its compact status. Its wider stance—measuring 1756 mm—paired with a lower height of 1409 mm, imparts a sporty character.
In contrast, the Toyota Aygo embraces its role as an efficient urban companion with its SUV-inspired design. Though shorter in length at 3700 mm, it stands taller at 1510 mm, which, combined with a width of 1740 mm, makes it a nimble navigator through tight city streets.
Power enthusiasts find more options with the Audi A1. It offers a range of engine outputs from 95 to 207 horsepower, with corresponding torque figures spanning 175 to 320 Nm. Its top acceleration capability boasts a sprint from 0-100 km/h in as little as 6.5 seconds, underscoring its agile nature. The A1 also contributes to diverse driving experience choices with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions.
The Toyota Aygo, powered by a more modest 72 horsepower engine, underscores efficiency above all. While acceleration peaks at a leisurely 15.5 seconds for 0-100 km/h, the Aygo’s lively city driving character comes courtesy of a 93 Nm torque, paired with either a manual gearbox or a CVT.
The Toyota Aygo shines in its low fuel consumption, sipping just 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions fall within 108 to 112 g/km, making it an environmentally considerate choice, designated within the CO2 Efficiency Class C.
Although more powerful, the Audi A1 maintains respectable environmental credentials, recording fuel consumption figures between 5.3 to 6.5 L/100km and CO2 outputs from 120 to 147 g/km. This positions it within the D and E efficiency classifications.
Inside, the Audi A1 offers spaciousness for five passengers, providing an upscale experience marked by a trunk capacity of 335 liters. On the ride comfort front, buyers will appreciate its ergonomic planning suited for longer journeys or daily drives alike.
The Aygo, more compact in nature, accommodates four passengers with a trunk size of 231 liters. Surprisingly generous given its smaller footprint, it exemplifies clever use of space, ensuring sufficient storage for typical commuting needs.
The Audi A1 and Toyota Aygo, while both similarly priced for their functionality, appeal to different sensibilities. The A1 stands out for drivers seeking performance with a premium edge, offering versatility in transmission, greater power, and a premium feel. Meanwhile, the Aygo caters to eco-conscious urban dwellers, offering great fuel efficiency, compact maneuverability, and commendable design features at its modest price point.
In essence, your choice between the two will align with whether luxury and performance trump efficiency and maneuverability in your urban expeditions.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Aygo has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15500 £, while the Audi A1 costs 19700 £. That’s a price difference of around 4166 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 4.80 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Audi A1 with 5.20 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A1 has a decisively edge – offering 207 HP compared to 72 HP. That’s roughly 135 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A1 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.50 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 15.50 s. That’s about 9 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi A1 performs distinct better – reaching 245 km/h, while the Toyota Aygo tops out at 158 km/h. The difference is around 87 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A1 pulls clearly stronger with 320 Nm compared to 93 Nm. That’s about 227 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Audi A1 offers slightly more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is slightly lighter – 1015 kg compared to 1175 kg. The difference is around 160 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi A1 offers distinct more room – 335 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi A1 performs noticeable better – up to 1090 L, which is about 261 L more than the Toyota Aygo.
When it comes to payload, Audi A1 distinct takes the win – 470 kg compared to 345 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
The Audi A1 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi A1 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Audi AG
The Audi A1 captivates with its sleek design and compact dimensions, making it an ideal choice for urban driving. Inside, it boasts a premium interior that reflects Audi's commitment to quality and attention to detail. With a spirited performance and advanced technology, the A1 delivers an engaging driving experience that appeals to both young and discerning drivers alike.
details
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
@ Audi AG
The Toyota Aygo presents itself as a compact city car, perfect for navigating tight urban spaces with ease. Its stylish design is complemented by a vibrant variety of colour options, making it a standout choice for those looking to express their individuality. Inside, the Aygo offers a comfortable and functional cabin, equipped with modern features that enhance the overall driving experience.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
@ Audi AG
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
19700 - 28300 £
|
Price
15500 - 22100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
118 - 146 g/km
|
co2
108 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1175 - 1365 kg
|
Curb weight
1015 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
335 L
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
4029 - 4046 mm
|
Length
3700 mm
|
|
Width
1740 - 1756 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
1409 - 1459 mm
|
Height
1510 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1090 L
|
Max trunk capacity
829 L
|
|
Payload
410 - 470 kg
|
Payload
345 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 207 HP
|
Power HP
72 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 11.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
15.5 - 15.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
182 - 245 km/h
|
Max Speed
151 - 158 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 320 Nm
|
Torque
93 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
70 - 152 kW
|
Power kW
53 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España