Compare performance (207 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (20,000 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A1 or VW T-Roc?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to compact vehicles, both the Audi A1 and Volkswagen T-Roc make compelling cases within their respective segments. As we navigate through the features, performances, and innovations of these two European contenders, you'll discover which vehicle may better suit your lifestyle and preferences. Let's dive into the details of these two standout models.
The Audi A1, with its hatchback design, is a city slicker favorite, offering a blend of sporty aesthetics and compact efficiency. Measuring between 4029mm and 4046mm in length, and standing 1459mm tall, it strikes a balance of agility and functionality. The T-Roc, on the other hand, embraces the SUV market with its bold stance. Stretching between 4236mm and 4271mm in length and reaching heights up to 1584mm, it exudes a more commanding presence on the road.
Audi A1’s engine lineup is powered exclusively by petrol, offering a range from 95HP to a thrilling 207HP. Depending on the variant, drivers can opt for either a 3-cylinder or 4-cylinder configuration, promising spirited dynamics with acceleration times from 11.5s to an impressive 6.5s for 0-100km/h. Transmission options include both manual and dual-clutch automatic gearboxes, all operating on front-wheel drive.
The T-Roc shows more variety in its power offerings. It caters to both petrol and diesel enthusiasts, with power ranging from a conservative 115HP to a robust 300HP. It offers a mix of front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, paired with manual or dual-clutch automatic transmissions. The acceleration spectrum ranges from a modest 12.3s to a swift 4.9s, ensuring there's a T-Roc model to match different driving desires.
For environmentally conscious drivers, the Audi A1 offers competitive fuel consumption rates, ranging from 5.3L/100km to 6.5L/100km, accompanied by CO2 emissions between 120g/km and 147g/km. Efficiency classes hover between D and E, reflecting its moderate eco-friendliness within the compact segment.
The T-Roc, while larger, provides an impressive range of consumption figures too, from 4.7L/100km when opting for its diesel variant to 8.5L/100km. The CO2 emissions vary from 125g/km in efficient models, scaling up to 194g/km. It covers a broader efficiency range from D to G, providing more options for differing environmental priorities.
The Audi A1, despite its compact form, remains practical with a 335L trunk capacity and seating for five. It's a nimble option perfect for urban exploration. Innovative features like its digital cockpit and connectivity solutions make it a tech-savvy choice for younger drivers.
The VW T-Roc, true to its SUV nature, offers greater trunk capacities between 284L and 445L. With available configurations for five or even four for a sportier lineup, it leans into versatility. The T-Roc is packed with cutting-edge tech, from driver assistance systems to elaborate infotainment setups, amplifying the driving experience.
The choice between the Audi A1 and VW T-Roc boils down to preference and lifestyle. The A1 caters to those desiring a sleek, efficient get-around with the prestige of Audi's design and performance. In contrast, the T-Roc appeals to those who want the space and capability of an SUV with the technological sophistication of VW.
Ultimately, both models bring something unique to the table, ensuring that whichever vehicle catches your fancy, you're in for an exhilarating drive.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi A1 is markedly cheaper – starting at 20,000 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,467 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A1 uses 5.2 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A1 offers noticeably more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A1 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A1 delivers noticeably more torque with 320 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A1 is noticeably lighter – 1,175 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 290 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi A1 offers a bit more boot space – 335 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries very slightly more – 515 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
The Audi A1 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A1 is a compact premium hatch that wraps Audi's polished design and surprisingly grown-up cabin into a city-friendly package. It’s poised and fun to drive, a smart pick for buyers who want luxury flair without the fuss of a bigger car — and it makes tight parking feel almost enjoyable.
details
The VW T‑Roc feels noticeably more grown‑up than before, with a much nicer cabin, sensible physical controls and a calm, well‑insulated ride that makes long trips comfortable. It’s compact and city‑friendly with practical rear seating, but the sloping roofline reduces rear headroom and tempting options can quickly push the price up, so buyers after maximum space or a sporty feel may want to consider alternatives.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,000 - 28,800 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
118 - 146 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,175 - 1,365 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
335 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,740 - 1,756 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 470 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 207 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 11.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
175 - 320 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 152 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España