Compare performance (400 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 36,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or CUPRA Terramar?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the fiercely competitive automotive market, the Audi A3 Sportback and the CUPRA Terramar present two fascinating options that cater to different tastes and needs. With both models offering advanced technology and impressive performance, car enthusiasts are eager to see how they stack up against each other. We take a closer look at their technical specifications and innovations that help define each vehicle.
Starting with the Audi A3 Sportback, this hatchback embodies a sleek and sophisticated design, making it an attractive option for those seeking a compact yet stylish vehicle. On the other hand, the CUPRA Terramar, classified as an SUV, offers a more rugged and robust aesthetic. This body type appeals to those needing additional space and versatility for urban commuting or family outings.
The A3 Sportback presents a range of engine configurations, including petrol, diesel, plug-in hybrid, and petrol mild-hybrid options, delivering power levels from 116 HP to a potent 400 HP. The smallest variant still manages an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 10.1 seconds, while the high-performance variant clocks in at a staggering 3.8 seconds.
Conversely, the CUPRA Terramar offers a slightly more limited engine lineup with petrol, petrol mild-hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options, producing between 150 HP and 272 HP. With a 0-100 km/h time as low as 5.3 seconds, the Terramar proves to be a noteworthy competitor, combining power and efficiency in a larger format.
The A3 Sportback comes with both manual and automatic transmission choices, including a dual-clutch automatic option. Its versatile drive types, including front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, cater to a range of driving preferences and conditions. In comparison, the CUPRA Terramar exclusively offers dual-clutch automatic transmissions with front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, ensuring a seamless driving experience.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Audi A3 Sportback shines, with an average consumption of just 4.8L/100 km for its most economical diesel variant. The hybrid model also boasts an impressive electric range of 139 km, making it an excellent choice for eco-conscious drivers.
The CUPRA Terramar, while slightly less efficient, brings versatility to the table. Its petrol variants range from 6.1L/100 km to 8.5L/100 km. However, it benefits from a plug-in hybrid option that bridges the gap in efficiency, producing only 10 g/km in CO2 emissions.
Both the A3 Sportback and CUPRA Terramar comfortably seat five passengers; however, the Terramar offers a distinct advantage in interior space with its trunk capacity reaching up to 540 liters. The A3 provides a solid 380 liters of space, which is still commendable for a hatchback. Inside, the Audi is renowned for its high-quality materials and refined finish, while the CUPRA presents a sportier, performance-oriented cabin that emphasizes driver engagement.
Safety is paramount in both models. The A3 Sportback is equipped with an array of advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and enhanced airbag systems. Similarly, the CUPRA Terramar integrates modern safety technologies but adds a sporty twist with features like launch control and various driving modes tailored for performance enthusiasts.
Choosing between the Audi A3 Sportback and the CUPRA Terramar ultimately comes down to personal preferences. The A3 Sportback excels in luxury, efficiency, and compact design, appealing to those looking for sophistication in a hatchback. Yet, the CUPRA Terramar offers a unique blend of sportiness, spaciousness, and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and adventure seekers alike.
Whether you prioritize style, efficiency, or versatility, both models promise impressive performance and innovative technologies. Your choice will reflect your lifestyle and driving ambitions, ensuring that whichever you pick, you'll be driving a vehicle that packs a punch on the road.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi A3 Sportback is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 36,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,874 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the CUPRA Terramar with 1.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 23 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers clearly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.9 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the CUPRA Terramar is very slightly faster – reaching 243 km/h, while the Audi A3 Sportback tops out at 237 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers a bit more torque with 500 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is visibly lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 1,638 kg. The difference is around 278 kg.
Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers clearly more boot space – 540 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.
When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries slightly more – 542 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.
The Audi A3 Sportback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
details
The CUPRA Terramar is a sharply styled, sporty SUV that brings athletic handling and bold design to buyers who want performance with everyday usability. Inside, premium finishes meet driver-focused flair and family-friendly practicality, making it a tempting pick for anyone who wants thrills without turning their daily routine into a chore.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 56,600 £
|
Price
36,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
|
Length
4,352 - 4,353 mm
|
Length
4,519 mm
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
1,869 mm
|
|
Height
1,441 - 1,470 mm
|
Height
1,586 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
225 - 237 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 243 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España