Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison
Compare performance (551 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A6 e-tron Avant
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is somewhat cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,814 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers moderately more range – reaching up to 716 km, about 116 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
Mustang Mach-E
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers slightly more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 64 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant takes 3.9 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers very slightly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 855 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.
A6 e-tron Avant
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 24 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers barely more boot space – 519 L compared to 502 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant carries marginally more – 500 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £55,200
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
502 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
4,928 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
|
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
470 - 500 kg
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.