VS

Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (551 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or Honda CR-V?

Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Honda CR-V

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • moderately lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 e-tron Avant

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Honda CR-V is visibly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,471 £.

As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers significantly more range – reaching up to 716 km, about 638 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers considerably more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 367 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Avant delivers clearly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 520 Nm more.

A6 e-tron Avant

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is moderately lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 364 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers moderately more boot space – 617 L compared to 502 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant carries barely more – 500 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,200
A6 e-tron Avant

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 326 - 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 539 - 716 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
The Honda CR-V and Lexus NX are two of the most sensible compact crossovers on the market—one prized for roomy practicality and strong value, the other for luxury, refinement and a more premium driving experience. This comparison shows how the CR-V’s efficient, user-friendly package stacks up …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A6 e-tron Avant

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.

details
A243176_medium
A243167_medium
A243148_medium

Reviews Audi A6 e-tron Avant

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda Jazz
Honda CR-V
VS
The Honda Jazz and Honda CR‑V target very different buyers: the Jazz is a clever, compact hatch ideal for city drivers who value efficiency and smart packaging, while the CR‑V is a roomier compact SUV built for families and longer trips. I’ll compare their space, fuel efficiency, driving feel, …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 comes down to practical reliability and value versus premium comfort and advanced safety tech. The CR-V is a roomy, efficient family SUV with low running costs, while the XC60 focuses on a refined interior, stronger safety credentials and a more …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and BMW iX3 are premium electric options aimed at buyers who want luxury, practicality and modern EV technology — the A6 e-tron Avant pairs a sleek Avant (estate) design with Audi’s new electric architecture, while the iX3 delivers a more conventional SUV form with BMW’s …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Honda CR-V
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V continues to impress with its blend of reliability and advanced technology, offering a spacious interior and a reputation for efficiency. On the other hand, the Dacia Bigster makes a compelling case as a more budget-friendly alternative, boasting a …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake
VS
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron and the Mercedes CLA Shooting Brake represent two different takes on stylish, practical estates — the A6 Avant e-tron as a sleek electric tourer and the CLA Shooting Brake as a sporty, design‑led hatchback. This comparison will help you decide which one fits your priorities …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
In the fiercely competitive segment of electric estate cars, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant stands out with its refined luxury and superior driving dynamics, catering to those seeking sophistication without compromising on sustainability. Conversely, the VW ID.7 Touring offers a practical and spacious …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
BMW i4
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the BMW i4 offer two distinct visions of electric driving: the A6 Avant pairs estate practicality and advanced tech with a premium, understated presence, while the i4 delivers a sportier, more driver-focused experience in a sleek four-door coupe-sedan. This comparison …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
502 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
4,928 mm
Length
-
Width
1,923 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
470 - 500 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Honda
What drivetrain options does the Audi A6 e-tron Avant have?

The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.