VS

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (551 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (53,800 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Sportback or Volvo XC40?

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

  • substantially more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space

Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • visibly lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A6 e-tron Sportback

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo XC40 is significantly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback costs 53,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,066 £.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 354 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is clearly faster – reaching 240 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback delivers considerably more torque with 855 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 555 Nm more.

A6 e-tron Sportback

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is visibly lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 487 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers very slightly more boot space – 502 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,330 L, about 2 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries barely more – 532 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £53,800
A6 e-tron Sportback

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 326 - 551 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 572 - 754 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback wraps futuristic electric technology in elegant, coupe-like proportions, so you arrive looking sharp without shouting for attention. Inside, refined materials and a calm, driver-focused layout make it a convincing choice for buyers who want quiet, effortless performance with a dash of everyday practicality — the kind of car that raises eyebrows without saying a word.

details
A244494_medium
A244492_medium
A243215_medium

Reviews Audi A6 e-tron Sportback

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (4 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the extrovert of the pair—bold styling, a quirky, techy interior and strong value that make it a fun crossover to live with, while the Volvo XC40 plays the long game with understated Scandinavian style, class-leading safety and a more premium feel. Pick the 3008 if you want …
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Lexus LBX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus LBX is a chic, compact premium crossover that trades the XC40's boxy utility for Japanese finesse — quieter, more refined and aimed at city buyers who value style and efficiency. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a more rugged, practical choice with more interior space, stronger safety tech …
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
The CUPRA Formentor is a punchy, coupe-styled compact SUV whose sharp chassis and spicy engines deliver grin-inducing drive and looks that demand attention; the Volvo XC40 answers with calm Scandinavian poise, clever practicality and safety tech that makes daily life feel worry-free. If you crave …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Lexus NX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus NX and Volvo XC40 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
53,800 - 98,700 £
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
572 - 754 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,400 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
502 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4,928 mm
Length
4,425 mm
Width
1,923 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
1,465 - 1,487 mm
Height
1,652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,330 L
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
Payload
470 - 500 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
Is the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.