In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether buyers prioritize style and affordability or luxury and innovation.
The compact SUV segment is witnessing a fierce competition, particularly between the Toyota C-HR and the Volvo XC40. Both vehicles offer unique features and innovations, catering to distinct preferences among buyers. In this article, we’ll delve deep into their specifications, technical offerings, and innovative technologies to help you decide which is the superior choice for your needs.
The Toyota C-HR presents an aggressive and sporty design with sharp lines and a distinctive front fascia. Measuring 4362 mm in length, 1832 mm in width, and 1558 mm in height, it exudes a modern aesthetic. The Volvo XC40, slightly larger at 4425 mm long, 1863 mm wide, and 1652 mm high, carries the signature Volvo look with a more robust and muscular presence. Both vehicles feature a five-door setup, ensuring practicality alongside style.
When comparing powertrains, the Toyota C-HR offers a range of options including Full Hybrid and Plug-in Hybrid engines with power outputs between 140 HP and 223 HP. This model delivers impressive fuel consumption as low as 4.7 L/100km, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers. The C-HR’s acceleration capabilities range from 7.4 to 9.9 seconds for 0-100 km/h, depending on the chosen engine.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 is equipped with a petrol MHEV engine providing up to 197 HP. While its fuel consumption stands at approximately 6.5 L/100km, it accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 7.6 seconds, slightly lagging behind its Toyota counterpart. Both vehicles, however, exhibit a top speed of 180 km/h, showcasing their performance prowess.
Both models feature automatic transmissions, with the Toyota C-HR utilizing a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) for smooth and efficient driving. The Volvo XC40 employs a dual-clutch automatic transmission, offering crisp shifting and enhanced control. The C-HR is available in both Front-Wheel Drive (FWD) and All-Wheel Drive (AWD) configurations, while the XC40 predominantly offers FWD, ensuring versatility in driving conditions.
Inside, the Toyota C-HR’s cabin is designed with a focus on comfort and modern technology. It provides ample space for five passengers and a trunk capacity ranging from 350 to 447 liters, depending on the variant. The cabin is equipped with the latest infotainment systems compatible with smartphones, adding convenience to every drive.
Conversely, the Volvo XC40 boasts a minimalist and contemporary interior that emphasizes Scandinavian design. With a trunk capacity of 452 liters, it offers slight superiority in cargo space. The XC40 is also known for its high-quality materials and advanced technology integration, including a sophisticated infotainment system that enhances the overall driving experience.
Fuel efficiency is a significant consideration for many buyers, and both the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 offer competitive figures. The C-HR’s hybrid variants, with emissions as low as 19 g/km, reflect a strong commitment to reducing environmental impact. In contrast, the XC40's CO2 emissions hover around 147–148 g/km, placing it at a disadvantage in the eco-friendly category.
Safety is a priority for both Toyota and Volvo. The C-HR is equipped with a robust set of safety features including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a pre-collision system. Meanwhile, Volvo's reputation for safety shines through with its innovative driver assistance systems and a comprehensive suite of safety technologies designed to protect occupants in various situations.
In summary, choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Volvo XC40 comes down to personal preference and priorities. The C-HR stands out for its hybrid efficiency, agility, and sporty design, making it an excellent choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the XC40 offers premium quality, superior interior comfort, and robust safety features that appeal to luxury buyers. Whether you prioritize environmental impact or a plush driving experience, both vehicles embody their brands’ dedication to quality, making them worthy contenders in today’s competitive SUV market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 30000 - 42800
£
|
Price
about 36400 - 46000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1
L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
67 - 68
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
17 - 115
g/km
|
co2
147 - 148
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
43
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755
kg
|
Curb weight
1688
kg
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447
L
|
Trunk capacity
452
L
|
Length
4362
mm
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Width
1832
mm
|
Width
1863
mm
|
Height
1558 - 1564
mm
|
Height
1652
mm
|
Payload
375 - 425
kg
|
Payload
532
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
140 - 223
HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6
s
|
Max Speed
175 - 180
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
265 - 300
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
103 - 164
kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145
kW
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
175 - 180
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.