VS

Audi e-tron GT vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (843 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (93,300 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi e-tron GT or Mazda CX-80?

Audi e-tron GT vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Audi e-tron GT

  • substantially more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

e-tron GT

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Audi e-tron GT costs 93,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 44,014 £.

As for electric range, the Audi e-tron GT offers substantially more range – reaching up to 617 km, about 557 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi e-tron GT offers substantially more power – delivering 843 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 516 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi e-tron GT is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi e-tron GT delivers substantially more torque with 1,027 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 477 Nm more.

e-tron GT

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is somewhat lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,355 kg. The difference is around 224 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi e-tron GT offers markedly more boot space – 405 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 147 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries noticeably more – 650 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi e-tron GT stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £93,300
e-tron GT

Audi e-tron GT

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 503 - 843 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 582 - 617 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Audi e-tron GT
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi e-tron GT

The Audi e-tron GT is a striking electric grand tourer that blends dramatic, low-slung styling with the hushed refinement of a luxury saloon. Behind the beautiful skin you'll find a driver-focused cabin and brisk, silent performance that makes daily commutes feel like auditioning for a weekend road trip — and yes, it manages to be both serious and a little bit smug about it.

details
A210772_overfull
A210761_overfull
A210763_overfull
A210762_overfull
A210735_overfull
A211416_overfull
A211417_overfull
A211462_overfull

Reviews Audi e-tron GT

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Audi e-tron GT
Polestar 5
VS
Audi e-tron GT and Polestar 5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi e-tron GT or the …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
BMW X5
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW X5 offers a blend of performance and opulence with its powerful engine options, refined interior, and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the new Mazda CX-80 presents a compelling alternative, delivering a spacious yet elegant cabin and Mazda's signature …
BMW X7
Mazda CX-80
VS
BMW X7 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the BMW X7 or the Mazda CX-80 is …
Audi e-tron GT
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
93,300 - 137,600 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 - 19 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
582 - 617 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,355 - 2,395 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
350 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,964 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
455 - 485 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
503 - 843 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
625 - 1,027 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
370 - 620 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
Is the Audi e-tron GT offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi e-tron GT is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.