Compare performance (300 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Ford Puma?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, the compact SUV segment has gained tremendous popularity, offering a blend of functionality, style, and efficiency. Two leading contenders in this category are the Audi Q2 and the Ford Puma. Both SUVs present a unique blend of performance, technology, and comfort, but they cater to different preferences and priorities. Let’s dive into a comprehensive comparison of these two dynamic vehicles.
The Audi Q2 boasts a bold and distinct design, characterized by its sharp edges and angular lines that scream modern sophistication. With a length of 4208 mm and a height of 1508 mm, it provides a commanding presence on the road. The Q2's sporty silhouette, wide stance, and Audi's trademark single-frame grille make a striking first impression.
In contrast, the Ford Puma offers a slightly more rounded profile, featuring fluid lines that enhance its athletic appearance. It measures about 4186 mm in length and stands at 1550 mm high, giving it a slightly taller stance compared to the Q2. Though both vehicles share a five-door layout, the Puma's playful design distinguishes it in the compact SUV market.
When it comes to engine options, the Audi Q2 presents a wider range of choices, including both petrol and diesel engines. The power output varies from 116 HP in the base model to a robust 300 HP in the high-performance Q2. Fuel efficiency ranges from 4.8 to 7.3 L/100 km, ensuring that even the performance-oriented models maintain a reasonable consumption rate.
The Ford Puma, on the other hand, primarily offers petrol engines alongside an innovative mild-hybrid electric variant. With power ratings up to 168 HP, its most compelling feature is the efficiency of the MHEV system and an impressive fuel consumption of 5.4 L/100 km. Furthermore, the fully electric version provides an electric range of up to 376 km, appealing to eco-conscious drivers.
The Q2 is available with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, providing options for drivers who appreciate tactile control as well as those who prefer effortless gear shifts. The all-wheel-drive variant enhances traction and stability, especially in adverse conditions, making it an excellent choice for those in regions with inclement weather.
The Ford Puma also offers manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, but its focus on front-wheel drive translates to a nimble and responsive driving experience. The combination of a lower curb weight and precise steering gives the Puma a sporty feel, ideal for urban settings and winding roads.
Inside the Q2, drivers are greeted with a premium cabin filled with high-quality materials and cutting-edge technology. Audi's MMI infotainment system is user-friendly, offering seamless connectivity options and a striking digital cockpit. The Q2 comfortably seats five with a trunk capacity of 405 litres, providing ample space for everyday use.
The Ford Puma features a modern interior that focuses on practicality, offering smart storage solutions and a spacious cabin. The infotainment system is user-friendly and supports modern connectivity options. It also boasts a slightly larger trunk capacity of 456 litres. Both vehicles ensure a comfortable ride, with ergonomic seating and a well-designed layout.
Safety is a priority for both manufacturers. The Audi Q2 is equipped with advanced safety features like adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning, and a variety of driver assistance systems that enhance safety on the road. Audi’s commitment to building safe vehicles is evident in the Q2’s robust construction and comprehensive safety features.
The Ford Puma doesn’t lag in safety technology, boasting a five-star Euro NCAP rating and featuring Ford's Co-Pilot360 technology, which includes pre-collision assist, blind-spot monitoring, and automatic emergency braking. This commitment to safety combined with innovative features establishes the Puma as a contender that prioritizes driver and passenger protection.
In the contest of Audi Q2 vs. Ford Puma, the choice ultimately comes down to individual preferences and requirements. The Q2 excels with its premium feel, diverse engine options, and all-wheel-drive capability, making it a great choice for those seeking performance with luxury. Meanwhile, the Ford Puma appeals to eco-conscious consumers and urban drivers with its efficient engines, spacious interior, and innovative options like the mild-hybrid variant.
Whether you prioritize luxury, efficiency, or cutting-edge technology, both the Audi Q2 and Ford Puma represent exceptional options in the compact SUV segment, ensuring that buyers have no shortage of excellent choices.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is marginally cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Audi Q2 costs 24,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 943 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q2 uses 4.8 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers considerably more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 132 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries only slightly more – 510 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.
The Audi Q2 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.
details
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
127 - 183 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 510 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España