VS

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (300 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Mazda CX-6e?

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Audi Q2

4.4 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially lighter
details

Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q2 is considerably cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,991 £.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers a bit more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

Q2

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q2 is substantially lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 875 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers somewhat more boot space – 468 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 63 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries visibly more – 510 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q2 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,900
Q2

Audi Q2

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q2

The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.

details
A207341_overfull
A207339_overfull
A207364_overfull
A207355_overfull
A207349_overfull
A207346_overfull

Reviews Audi Q2

4.4 (5 Reviews)
rate
ribiere
13 Jul 2026, 07:51:47

I've had a Q2 TDI 116 since 2018 with 108,000 km. No engine or chassis problems. Except for weakness of the front-left tyre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
miles
14 Feb 2026, 20:00:47

ive really enjoyed my 2 audi q2s and still looking for a match .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Peter
27 Jul 2026, 17:46:47

Quality is a top priority at Mazda. No engine problems like with some other manufacturers in the past. Why should it be any different as an electric car.
The equipment focuses on the essentials… Great battery..
Visually very nice…
Will shake up the upper echelons of the car market at that price..

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
The Audi Q2 and VW T‑Cross are compact crossovers that blend city-friendly size with SUV styling, but they take very different approaches to luxury, practicality and driving feel. This head-to-head compares their engines, interiors, technology and ownership costs so you can decide which suits your …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Audi Q2
VW Taigo
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q2 and the VW Taigo comes down to whether you prioritise a premium badge, sharper handling and higher-quality finishes (Audi Q2) or a more affordable, coupe-styled crossover with smart packaging and lower running costs (VW Taigo). I’ll compare driving dynamics, interior …
Audi A1
Audi Q2
VS
Choosing between the A1 and the Q2 comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a taller compact crossover with more space. The A1 is built for sharp handling, efficiency and style in tight urban settings, while the Q2 delivers a higher driving position, extra practicality and a more …
Audi Q2
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q2 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions with a touch of style and practicality. This comparison focuses on driving feel, interior space, technology and ownership costs to help you decide which suits your priorities.
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 183 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 510 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.