Compare performance (272 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 20,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Citroen C4?
In the ever-more-competitive automotive landscape, two players are vying for attention in the compact SUV segment: the Audi Q3 and the Citroën C4. With both vehicles catering to diverse drivers' needs and preferences, it's essential to delve into their tech aspects and innovations to understand what sets them apart. Let's explore these vigorous contenders for 2024 and 2025, respectively.
The 2024 Audi Q3 offers a range of petrol and diesel engines, featuring a power output between 150 to 245 HP, delivering torque figures up to 400 Nm. The engine capacity stretches from 1498 to 1984 cm³. This SUV can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.8 seconds, demonstrating a remarkable balance of speed and efficiency.
On the other hand, the 2025 Citroën C4 comes with an impressive choice of petrol, mild hybrid, and electric engines. Its power output varies from 101 to 156 HP, combined with a torque of up to 270 Nm. The C4's acceleration spans from 8 to 10.8 seconds depending on the variant, complemented by an electric range extending up to 427 km for the EV model.
Focusing on fuel consumption, the Audi Q3 offers a range between 5.5 to 8.5 L/100km, with emissions ranging from 143 to 193 g/km, classified in CO2 efficiency classes E, F, and G. Audi's engineering ensures not just performance but also a focus on better fuel management.
Citroën C4 stands out in its stride toward efficiency, offering a lower fuel consumption profile, particularly in hybrid forms. For electric versions, the consumption is as efficient as 14.5 kWh/100km, with CO2 emissions at a mere 0 for its EV. This reflects Citroën's commitment to reducing its environmental footprint.
Both SUVs seats five comfortably but offer distinct trunk capacities: Audi Q3 comes with a 530 L trunk, while Citroën C4 provides up to 510 L. Audi once again molds its interior with precision engineering, offering a luxurious ride with advanced tech features on their dashboard that enhance the driving experience.
Citroën’s C4, while providing a slightly smaller trunk, delivers a more compact size well-suited for urban environments. It also features a modern automatic gearbox, focusing on ease and smoothness in city navigation.
Audi’s Q3 integrates state-of-the-art technology like the Dual-Clutch Automatic transmission and both Front-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive options, embracing a range of driving needs. The available Manual Gearbox reflects its decision to cater to driving traditionalists as well.
Meanwhile, Citroën C4 introduces advanced electrification with its reduction gearbox in the electric variant, enhancing energy efficiency. The all-electric version points to the future with an innovative approach to sustainability and function, making it incredibly attractive for the environmentally conscious.
The Audi Q3 and Citroën C4 both bring a unique flavor to the compact SUV segment. Audi leans towards luxury, offering powerful performance and versatile engineering solutions, while Citroën offers a tantalizing mix of contemporary efficiency, modern design, and future-oriented technology. Both vehicles are sure to captivate your interest, depending on whether you prioritize luxury and performance or sustainability and efficiency.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Citroen C4 is considerably cheaper – starting at 20,600 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,666 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Citroen C4 with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C4 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 427 km, about 308 km more than the Audi Q3.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers considerably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 116 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Citroen C4 takes 8 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C4 is somewhat lighter – 1,403 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 232 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Citroen C4 offers very slightly more boot space – 510 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries markedly more – 535 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 129 kg.
The Audi Q3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
20,600 - 32,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,659 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,350 - 4,580 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,520 - 1,525 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,250 - 1,360 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España