VS

Audi Q3 vs Ford Explorer EV comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (38200 £ vs 34200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Ford Explorer EV?

Audi Q3 vs Ford Explorer EV: Key differences

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • evident lighter
  • minimal more trunk space

Ford Explorer EV

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • to a small extent more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • hardly perceptible quicker from 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Explorer EV has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4028 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV performs significantly better – achieving up to 602 km, about 483 km more than the Audi Q3.

Explorer EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV has a to a small extent edge – offering 340 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.30 s, while the Audi Q3 takes 5.70 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Explorer EV pulls decisively stronger with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm difference.

Q3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q3 is evident lighter – 1635 kg compared to 1996 kg. The difference is around 361 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Audi Q3 offers minimal more room – 488 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 16 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Explorer EV hardly perceptible takes the win – 585 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Explorer EV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Explorer EV
Kia EV5
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives like a burly, tech-laden American SUV — roomy, confident on the road and aimed at buyers who want presence and practicality in electric form. The Kia EV5 counters with sharper styling, clever packaging and a value-packed tech suite, making it the smarter, more …
Ford Capri
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Ford Capri is a cheeky, analogue icon that rewards you with pure-driver thrills, whereas the Ford Explorer EV is a spacious, gadget-rich electric SUV built for practicality and long-distance calm. Choose the Capri if you crave character and a cornering grin; choose the Explorer EV if you need …
Audi Q3
Ford Explorer EV

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 17.3 kWh
  • Electric Range : 417 - 602 km
details

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Ford Explorer EV

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.

details
339B09E4-87F0-4F47-8A68-7DA1B14BD783
46E73473-7BD4-4D0A-B7B7-433A0148B614
09A01900-4D34-480B-A9A5-1A89755E12FF

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Reviews Ford Explorer EV

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Olle Westberg
22 Feb 2026, 20:59:34

600 km real-world range in summer; handles me — I'm just over 190 cm and 100 kg.

Better looking than the ID.4 and often available at a really good price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
D.W.
29 Oct 2025, 18:09:06

I have owned and worked on Ford products for years and I am now driving an 07 Explorer 4.0 liter. 1 transmission and multiple soft parts and switches >300.000.
Klm. and still looks and runs great.
I am a Ford fan and will continue to be one, however the Rxplorer is looking dated. Come on you guys time for a Ford Home run. How about a totally resigned Ford Explorer. Hey how bout a diesel or a hybrid

Audi Q3
Ford Explorer EV

Costs and Consumption
Price
38200 - 52900 £
Price
34200 - 48800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1635 - 1900 kg
Curb weight
1996 - 2209 kg
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1859 mm
Width
1872 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 535 kg
Payload
531 - 585 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Ford

Similar Comparisons

Ford Explorer EV
Kia EV3
VS
Ford Explorer EV plays the roomy family hero with grown‑up comfort and long‑legged cruising, while the Kia EV3 counters with city‑smart size, clever storage, and value that squeezes your budget less than your parking space. If you haul kids, dogs, and flat‑packs, go Explorer; if you want a …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV arrives with true American muscle—room for the whole crew, solid range and tow-ready guts—perfect if you want a family hauler that eats motorways for breakfast. The Skoda Elroq, by contrast, is a nimble, value-packed city specialist with clever storage and low running costs, …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
Audi Q3
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq stand out with their distinct character and appeal. While the Q3 offers a luxurious interior and advanced tech features that cater to premium buyers, the Karoq impresses with its practicality and value for money, making it a …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
Ford Explorer EV
VW ID.4
VS
The Ford Explorer EV brings American swagger to the MEB party with punchy performance and a clever sliding 14.6-inch screen, while the VW ID.4 counters with calm refinement, strong efficiency, and a well-proven ownership experience. Want character and kit for the money? Go Explorer; crave serenity …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
Is the Audi Q3 offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.