Compare performance (272 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q3 or Skoda Kamiq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling market of compact SUVs, few vehicles stand out as much as the Audi Q3 and the Skoda Kamiq. Each carries the hallmark of German engineering and offers unique features to captivate prospective buyers. This article dives deep into a face-off between these two models, examining their technical aspects, innovations, and what makes each of them distinct.
The Audi Q3 offers a versatile range of engine types, including both petrol and diesel options, catering to various preferences. With a wider horsepower range from 150 to 245 HP, the Q3 promises dynamic driving experiences, with a top speed reaching up to 233 km/h. It also offers more flexibility with transmission choices, sporting both manual and dual-clutch automatic options, and a choice between front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive for different terrains and driving conditions.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kamiq is exclusively petrol-driven, focusing on simplicity and efficiency. The Kamiq's engine outputs range from 95 to 150 HP, with a maximum speed of 214 km/h. While it offers the same transmission types as the Q3, it commits solely to front-wheel drive, making it a straightforward choice for urban and suburban driving.
With growing awareness of environmental impact, fuel efficiency is crucial. The Kamiq scores well in fuel consumption, achieving 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions are also modest, ranging between 121 and 130 g/km, aligning with a better CO2 efficiency class of D.
The Audi Q3, despite its powerful engine options, presents a higher fuel consumption ranging from 5.5 to 8.5 L/100km, depending on the model configuration. Its CO2 emissions span from 143 to 193 g/km, categorizing it under efficiency classes E to G. However, the Q3 compensates for this with higher performance metrics.
In terms of design, the Audi Q3 has a more robust presence with a length of 4484 to 4500 mm, a width of 1843 to 1849 mm, and a height of 1567 to 1585 mm. Its larger dimensions translate into more interior space and trunk capacity, offering 530 liters for cargo.
The Skoda Kamiq, with its compact form factor of 4241 mm length, 1793 mm width, and 1562 mm height, is designed for city convenience while still providing a substantial trunk capacity of 400 liters. The compact size aids in maneuverability and parking ease, especially in crowded urban settings.
Both SUVs offer seating for five, blending utility with comfort. The Audi Q3's slightly larger interior dimensions afford it an edge in legroom and space comfort for all passengers. Meanwhile, the Kamiq’s interior design is known for its practicality and clever use of space, accommodating passengers comfortably despite the vehicle's smaller stature.
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the Skoda Kamiq ultimately comes down to priorities. The Audi Q3 appeals to those who value performance, luxury, and a broad engine selection. Its higher power output and optional all-wheel-drive system are tailored for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience.
The Skoda Kamiq is the perfect match for drivers seeking efficiency, simplicity, and practicality. Its compact size and superior fuel economy make it an ideal companion for urban environments and daily commutes.
Both vehicles boast the reliability and quality expected from their respective brands, making them excellent contenders in the compact SUV segment. The decision rests on whether one's preference leans towards sheer power and luxury or efficient, no-nonsense practicality.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kamiq is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,960 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers significantly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is noticeably lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers somewhat more boot space – 488 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 88 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries only slightly more – 539 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
The Audi Q3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.
details
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
39 - 195 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 535 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España