VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 530 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or BYD Sealion 7?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

BYD Sealion 7

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q4 e-tron

Quick comparison: Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7

The Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Sealion 7 comparison starts with two similar promises—quiet, electric family transport—but the cars take different routes to deliver them. The Audi Q4 e-tron projects an understated, refined character focused on calm cruising and familiar Audi ergonomics, while the BYD Sealion 7 arrives as a tech‑heavy, punchier proposition loaded with standard equipment. The Q4 e-tron emphasises predictability and usable controls, the Sealion 7 emphasises performance and kit even if that brings a few compromises. Those divergent priorities shape comfort, usability and running costs in everyday life. Below we unpack how each car behaves in traffic, on long trips, in the cabin and for real families so you can judge the trade-offs that matter to you.

Sealion 7

Driving character and everyday usability

On the road the Audi Q4 e-tron feels like a composed cruiser, its steering and suspension tuned for predictable, calm progress rather than sharp responses. By contrast the BYD Sealion 7 delivers much more shove and low‑end urge, so overtakes feel effortless but cornering rewards are muted by light steering and noticeable body roll. If you live in town and value easy parking and confidence at junctions, the Q4 e-tron's more compact handling and gentle energy recuperation make daily driving less fatiguing. If you prefer instant thrust and a heavier, planted sensation on the motorway, the Sealion 7's stronger performance will suit your taste despite being less nimble in tight spaces. In short, the Q4 e-tron leans toward composed competence while the Sealion 7 leans toward cruiser punch with compromises in finesse.

Q4 e-tron

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On long runs both the Audi Q4 e-tron and BYD Sealion 7 impress with low cabin noise, but they reach that quietness differently: the Q4 e-tron through refined isolation and the Sealion 7 through mass and thorough sealing. The Audi Q4 e-tron’s seats and suspension encourage relaxed motorway miles and its charging behaviour is generally predictable, which makes planning long journeys straightforward. The BYD Sealion 7 rewards with very comfortable seats, generous rear legroom and abundant comfort tech, but its higher consumption on sustained high‑speed sections shortens practical stretches between stops. That trade‑off matters on multi‑hour trips where fewer stops often outweigh outright pace. Choose based on whether you prefer fewer, longer legs (Q4 e-tron) or a plush, well‑equipped lounge that needs more frequent charging (Sealion 7).

Sealion 7

Cabin feel, materials and infotainment

Inside the Audi Q4 e-tron you get a familiar Audi layout — tactile climate buttons, clear graphics and a conservative design — but some hard plastics remind you this is not full‑blown luxury at all trim levels. The BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, often feels richer in materials and comes with more kit as standard, including a rotating central screen and high‑resolution cameras that give a premium first impression. Where the Q4 e-tron scores in straightforward ergonomics and a coherent control logic, the Sealion 7 sometimes stumbles with menu organisation and translation oddities that make certain functions less intuitive. Steering‑wheel controls and capacitive touch items in the Audi can frustrate, but they live within a predictable Audi interface many buyers prefer. Put simply: Audi trades conservative, user‑friendly layout and modest material compromises for BYD’s glossy kit and occasional usability quirks.

Q4 e-tron

Practicality, family use and city friendliness

Practical daily life highlights clear contrasts: the Audi Q4 e-tron offers a very usable boot layout and sensible rear packaging, while the BYD Sealion 7 gives extra rear legroom and a front trunk but a luggage area that is less generous in everyday tests than on paper. In tight urban settings the Q4 e-tron's smaller turning circle and predictable controls make parking and manoeuvring noticeably easier than the wider, taller Sealion 7. BYD’s 360° cameras and abundant driver aids do mitigate blind spots and curb risks, but they can't erase the Sealion 7’s bulk when squeezing into tight spaces. Payload and day‑to‑day loading feel more confidence‑inspiring in the Q4 e-tron, particularly if you routinely carry heavy gear or a full family. So city‑first buyers will likely prefer the Q4 e-tron, while those prioritising rear comfort and equipment may accept the Sealion 7’s urban trade‑offs.

Sealion 7

Buyer fit: who should choose which car?

If you’re deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and BYD Sealion 7, the choice boils down to temperament and routine: pick the Q4 e-tron if you prioritise low noise, predictable controls, efficient long runs and a conservative premium cabin logic. Choose the BYD Sealion 7 if you value stronger performance, richer standard equipment and a more lavish initial impression and can accept higher running consumption plus occasional software‑oriented quirks. Both cars suit families and motorway miles, but they serve different priorities—the Q4 e-tron stretches each charge and smooths daily life, the Sealion 7 offers lounge‑style rear comfort and punch at the cost of more frequent stops. Your typical mix of city driving, long motorway runs and appetite for tech will reveal which trade‑off makes sense. Below we turn those character differences into the concrete technical and range comparisons that determine ownership costs and daily usability.

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
BYD Sealion 7
MG MGS6 EV
VS
The BYD Sealion 7 and MG MGS6 EV are two electric contenders aimed at buyers who want strong range, practicality and good value. This comparison focuses on their driving range, charging, performance, interior comfort and running costs to help you decide which suits your everyday needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q4 e-tron is only slightly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the BYD Sealion 7 costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,134 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is noticeably more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 19.9 kWh/100km for the BYD Sealion 7. That’s a difference of about 5.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers a bit more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 90 km more than the BYD Sealion 7.

Sealion 7

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Sealion 7 offers noticeably more power – delivering 530 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Sealion 7 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Sealion 7 delivers barely more torque with 690 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 11 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,225 kg. The difference is around 190 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers marginally more boot space – 535 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries noticeably more – 515 kg compared to 410 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Sealion 7 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
Sealion 7

BYD Sealion 7

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 530 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.9 - 21.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 456 - 502 km
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Sealion 7

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

BYD Sealion 7

The BYD Sealion 7 is a sleek electric wagon that blends sporty styling with surprising practicality, making it a compelling choice for drivers who want something different from the usual hatchback or SUV. Its refined interior and composed road manners give it an upscale feel, while clever packaging keeps it versatile for daily use.

details
img-0696
byd-sealion-7-17
byd-sealion-7-12

Reviews BYD Sealion 7

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Steinbach
2 Jun 2026, 11:36:25

Fantastic car in every respect. Looks, interior, power, range, comfort, finish, etc.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
oriol
27 Feb 2026, 15:33:27

range that I can always charge to 100% — unlike other brands that told me it was recommended to stop at 80%, which consequently cut my real range from 600 to 480 by not being able to charge to 100%. I think that's something people should know.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BYD Seal U
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Choosing between the Seal U and the Sealion 7 means weighing sportier driving dynamics against extra space and everyday practicality. This quick comparison highlights the key differences in performance, range, interior comfort and value so you can pick the BYD that best fits your needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
BYD Seal
BYD Sealion 7
VS
This comparison looks at the BYD Seal and the BYD Sealion 7 to help you decide which electric BYD best fits your needs. The Seal is a sleek, performance-oriented electric sedan, while the Sealion 7 focuses on greater practicality and interior flexibility for buyers who need more space.
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
BYD Sealion 7
ZEEKR 7X
VS
The BYD Sealion 7 plays the value card with clever packaging, generous range claims and soft-riding manners, while the ZEEKR 7X feels like the sharper, tech-forward alternative that’s happier chasing pace and premium detailing. If you want an everyday EV that stretches your money on range and …
Toyota bZ4X
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The Toyota bZ4X feels like a reliably mellow electric SUV — conservative styling, predictable handling and Toyota-level build confidence for buyers who want fuss-free ownership. The BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, punches above its price with slick tech, impressive range and a sportier edge, making it …
XPeng G6
BYD Sealion 7
VS
The XPeng G6 and BYD Sealion 7 are two leading Chinese electric models that pair advanced technology and competitive range with distinct design and driving philosophies. This head‑to‑head compares range, performance, interior tech and ownership costs to help you choose the better fit for your needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Sealion 7

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
42,800 - 52,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.9 - 21.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
456 - 502 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,225 - 2,435 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
520 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,925 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
410 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
313 - 530 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
380 - 690 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
230 - 390 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
BYD
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.