VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Tang comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 517 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 64,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or BYD Tang?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BYD Tang: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

BYD Tang

  • noticeably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q4 e-tron is considerably cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,571 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 24 kWh/100km for the BYD Tang. That’s a difference of about 9.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers slightly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 62 km more than the BYD Tang.

Tang

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang offers noticeably more power – delivering 517 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers barely more torque with 680 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 1 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: BYD Tang offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,630 kg. The difference is around 595 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more boot space – 535 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 300 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Tang carries a bit more – 575 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Tang

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details

BYD Tang

The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.

details
Audi Q4 e-tron
BYD Tang

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
64,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
530 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,630 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
235 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,955 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
575 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
517 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
680 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
380 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
BYD
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.