VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Mitsubishi ASX?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mitsubishi ASX: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,952 £.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 182 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 434 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is substantially lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 739 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers only slightly more boot space – 535 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries slightly more – 515 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EX60 are competing compact premium electric SUVs that take different approaches to design, driving feel and in-cabin experience. This comparison will cut through specs and real-world strengths to help you choose between the Q4 e-tron’s refined driving dynamics and Audi …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Tavascan, two compact electric crossovers that blend practicality with distinctive styling. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, interior quality and value to help you choose which fits your needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq are closely related electric SUVs that share VW Group underpinnings but take different approaches to design, equipment and driving character. This comparison focuses on practicality, driving experience, technology and value to help you decide which fits your needs.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Explorer EV put a premium compact luxury electric SUV up against a larger, family-focused electric crossover — one emphasizes refined driving dynamics and upscale interiors, the other prioritizes space, practicality and towing capability. I’ll compare range, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q6 e-tron are Audi’s electric SUV siblings: the compact Q4 emphasizes city-friendly size and efficiency, while the Q6 moves upmarket with more interior space, range and advanced tech. This side‑by‑side comparison will show whether the Q4’s agility and value or the Q6’s …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mercedes GLB
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Mercedes GLB both target buyers wanting a premium compact SUV, but they approach that goal very differently. The Q4 e-tron is a purpose-built electric crossover focused on efficiency, tech and a refined ride, while the GLB is a more traditional gasoline-powered (with hybrid …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
99 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.