VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • substantially more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q4 e-tron is substantially cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 234,686 £.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers substantially more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 260 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers markedly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 221 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 625 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers barely more boot space – 555 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries markedly more – 840 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 325 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
serpimg_Pd0UC9

Reviews Rolls-Royce Cullinan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EX60 are competing compact premium electric SUVs that take different approaches to design, driving feel and in-cabin experience. This comparison will cut through specs and real-world strengths to help you choose between the Q4 e-tron’s refined driving dynamics and Audi …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q5
VS
Comparing the all-electric Audi Q4 e-tron with the mainstream Audi Q5 brings together two very different takes on the compact luxury SUV: the Q4 e-tron emphasizes electric driving, a tech-forward cabin and lower running costs, while the Q5 offers petrol/diesel/plug-in options, proven practicality …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and the Ford Explorer EV put a premium compact luxury electric SUV up against a larger, family-focused electric crossover — one emphasizes refined driving dynamics and upscale interiors, the other prioritizes space, practicality and towing capability. I’ll compare range, …
Audi Q4 e-tron
VW ID.7
VS
In the competitive electric vehicle landscape, the Audi Q4 e-tron and VW ID.7 stand out for their innovative designs and technology. The Q4 e-tron offers a more upscale interior with premium materials, while the ID.7 focuses on spaciousness and practicality for everyday use. Both models feature …
Audi Q4 e-tron
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Audi Q4 e-tron stands out with its sleek design and cutting-edge electric technology, offering a premium feel that appeals to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW Tiguan maintains its reputation for practicality and spaciousness, providing a versatile …
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Audi
Brand
Rolls-Royce
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.