Compare performance (340 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 28,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or SsangYong Musso?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
SsangYong Musso is significantly cheaper – starting at 28,700 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,009 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 138 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 279 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 10 kg.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Musso carries considerably more – 1,010 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 495 kg.
The Audi Q4 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.
detailsThe Musso is a no-nonsense pickup that blends rugged capability with surprisingly comfy cabin manners, perfect for buyers who want practicality over prestige. It may not turn heads at the coffee stop, but its sensible layout, useful load space and low running costs make it a very pragmatic choice for workdays and weekends.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
|
Price
28,700 - 42,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
8.4 - 9.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
221 - 245 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
75 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,260 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,095 - 5,405 mm
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,840 - 1,855 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
785 - 1,010 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
183 - 187 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
SsangYong
|