Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q5 vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (367 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (46,400 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q5 or Renault Arkana?
Audi Q5 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q5
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Arkana is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Audi Q5 costs 46,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,914 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q5 uses 2.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q5 offers considerably more power – delivering 367 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 224 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q5 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q5 delivers significantly more torque with 580 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 375 Nm more.
Q5
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is visibly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,910 kg. The difference is around 400 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q5 carries visibly more – 565 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q5 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £46,400
Audi Q5
Audi Q5
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q5
The Audi Q5 feels like the sensible luxury choice — polished cabin materials, a calm ride and enough tech to keep commuters and weekend adventurers equally pleased. It won't shout for attention but will quietly check the boxes for buyers who want refinement, space and everyday usability with a dash of Audi charisma.
details
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Audi Q5
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
46,400 - 79,600 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 8.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
92 - 100 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
56 - 189 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,910 - 2,245 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
433 - 520 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
490 - 565 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
340 - 580 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 - 2,995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.