VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Mazda CX-80?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,100 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 668 km, about 608 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers noticeably more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers markedly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is only slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers clearly more boot space – 526 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries slightly more – 650 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details
A242848_medium
A242855_medium
A244272_medium

Reviews Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:29:37

A slightly inflated price relative to the equipment included in this car.

Bula
11 Oct 2025, 08:59:08

Comfortable, but feels a bit firmer (over small bumps) than the Q5. You can tell the car has some heft!! The electric power — 388 PS / 285 kW BEV — is incredible. The battery drops pretty quickly if you push the beast a little. The advertised 600 km range is generous on paper; expect more like 500, or even 450 in winter. The onboard technology is surprising and pushed to the extreme. After trying it, it's hard to go back to a non-electric model.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron and BMW iX3 represent two different takes on the premium electric SUV: the Q6 e-tron focuses on advanced tech and long-range efficiency, while the iX3 emphasizes BMW’s driving dynamics and familiar refinement. Below I’ll compare their range, performance, interior quality and …
Audi Q5
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q5 is a well-rounded mid-size SUV that blends comfort, practicality and conventional petrol/diesel (or mild-hybrid) powertrains; the Audi Q6 e-tron is Audi’s fully electric premium SUV focused on range, advanced tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Choosing between them comes down to …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q6 e-tron are Audi’s electric SUV siblings: the compact Q4 emphasizes city-friendly size and efficiency, while the Q6 moves upmarket with more interior space, range and advanced tech. This side‑by‑side comparison will show whether the Q4’s agility and value or the Q6’s …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the Audi Q6 e-tron bring electric power to two distinct Audi philosophies: the Avant offers a low, aerodynamic touring wagon focused on efficiency and luggage capacity, while the Q6 e-tron is a higher-riding SUV that emphasizes space, visibility and everyday …
Audi A6 Avant
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
In this showdown between the Audi A6 Avant and the Audi Q6 e-tron, enthusiasts will find a compelling clash of tradition and innovation. The A6 Avant impresses with its classic blend of performance and practicality, offering a spacious interior and agile handling. Meanwhile, the Q6 e-tron showcases …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Audi Q6 e-tron?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.