VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Renault Captur comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Renault Captur?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Renault Captur: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Captur is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,043 £.

Captur

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers significantly more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 332 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers clearly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 590 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is considerably lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 877 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers a bit more boot space – 526 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries moderately more – 540 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 87 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Renault Captur
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Renault Captur and Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, practicality and efficient powertrains. The Captur leans on bold design and flexible interior space, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes hybrid efficiency, Toyota’s …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details
A242848_medium
A242855_medium
A244272_medium

Reviews Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:29:37

A slightly inflated price relative to the equipment included in this car.

Bula
11 Oct 2025, 08:59:08

Comfortable, but feels a bit firmer (over small bumps) than the Q5. You can tell the car has some heft!! The electric power — 388 PS / 285 kW BEV — is incredible. The battery drops pretty quickly if you push the beast a little. The advertised 600 km range is generous on paper; expect more like 500, or even 450 in winter. The onboard technology is surprising and pushed to the extreme. After trying it, it's hard to go back to a non-electric model.

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Lüsi
15 May 2026, 16:11:37

More affordable, high-level infotainment and better quality — good value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron and BMW iX3 represent two different takes on the premium electric SUV: the Q6 e-tron focuses on advanced tech and long-range efficiency, while the iX3 emphasizes BMW’s driving dynamics and familiar refinement. Below I’ll compare their range, performance, interior quality and …
Renault Captur
VW T-Roc
VS
The Renault Captur and the VW T‑Roc are two popular compact crossovers that combine agile urban sizing with SUV styling, yet they differ in driving feel, interior quality and practicality. This quick comparison highlights the key strengths and trade-offs to help you choose the better fit for …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Captur brings together two popular small SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality, low running costs and modern equipment. I’ll cut through the marketing to show how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs so you can choose the one …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Renault Captur
VS
The Citroën C3 Aircross and Renault Captur are two compact crossover SUVs that blend city-friendly size with SUV practicality, each offering clever packaging, efficient engines and a comfortable ride. Choose the C3 Aircross if you prioritise quirky styling, outstanding interior flexibility and a …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
21,400 - 28,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
447 - 453 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Audi Q6 e-tron?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.