Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Volvo ES90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (490 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 61700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Volvo ES90?
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Audi Q6 e-tron has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 54400 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 61700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7277 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Audi Q6 e-tron: with 15.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Volvo ES90 with 15.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.
As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 700 km, about 44 km more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.
Q6 e-tron
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 has a evident edge – offering 680 HP compared to 490 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Audi Q6 e-tron takes 4.40 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs noticeable better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Volvo ES90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo ES90 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 870 Nm compared to 855 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Audi Q6 e-tron is slight lighter – 2200 kg compared to 2410 kg. The difference is around 210 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers to a small extent more room – 526 L compared to 424 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs barely noticeable better – up to 1529 L, which is about 102 L more than the Volvo ES90.
When it comes to payload, Audi Q6 e-tron hardly perceptible takes the win – 540 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 40 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo ES90 holds a very small edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo ES90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £61,700
Volvo ES90
Audi Q6 e-tron
5 (2 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
Volvo ES90
3.5 (2 Reviews)
The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo ES90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
61700 - 81000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
651 - 700 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
2410 - 2610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
424 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
5000 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
1942 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1546 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1427 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.