VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 69,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Volvo ES90?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

Volvo ES90

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • marginally more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q6 e-tron is clearly cheaper – starting at 54,400 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 69,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,506 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q6 e-tron is barely more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo ES90. That’s a difference of about 1.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 706 km, about 38 km more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 490 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Audi Q6 e-tron takes 4.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers barely more torque with 870 Nm compared to 855 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q6 e-tron is slightly lighter – 2,200 kg compared to 2,610 kg. The difference is around 410 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries somewhat more – 540 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £69,900
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 456 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 km
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
69,900 - 74,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
460 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
456 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
670 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
335 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.