Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mazda MX-30 comparison
Compare performance (503 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Mazda MX-30?
Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mazda MX-30: Key differences
Q8 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda MX-30 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 34,209 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mazda MX-30 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 18.3 kWh/100km compared to 19.7 kWh/100km for the Audi Q8 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 1.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers clearly more range – reaching up to 595 km, about 510 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
MX-30
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 333 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi Q8 e-tron is noticeably faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
Q8 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is noticeably lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 736 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers noticeably more boot space – 569 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 219 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,637 L, about 482 L more than the Mazda MX-30.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries markedly more – 595 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 193 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q8 e-tron stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £65,100
Audi Q8 e-tron
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q8 e-tron
The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.
details
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mazda MX-30
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
22 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
|
Length
4,915 mm
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
|
Payload
515 - 595 kg
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.