@ BMW Group Press
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs VW T-Roc – Which car suits you better?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether BMW 2 Series Active Tourer or VW T-Roc fits your lifestyle better.

2 Series Active Tourer @ BMW Group Press

BMW 2er Active Tourer vs. VW T-Roc: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive landscape is constantly evolving, with manufacturers striving to meet consumer demands for functionality, comfort, and innovation. In this comparative analysis, we delve into two prominent models of 2024: the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the VW T-Roc. Each of these vehicles offers unique features and capabilities, appealing to different segments of the market. Let’s explore the technical specifications and innovations that set these two apart.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Body Type and Interior Space

Firstly, the BMW 2er Active Tourer is defined as a Multi-Purpose Vehicle (MPV), emphasizing versatility and interior space. With a length of 4,386 mm, a width of 1,824 mm, and a height of 1,576 mm, it offers ample room for passengers and luggage alike. Its trunk capacity of 470 liters means you won’t struggle to fit your essentials when on the road.

Contrastingly, the VW T-Roc is characterized as a Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV), which typically offers a more rugged aesthetic and performance. Measuring between 4,236 mm and 4,271 mm in length, and with a height variance from 1,527 mm to 1,584 mm, the T-Roc provides a sportier profile. Its trunk capacity of 445 liters ensures it is also practical for daily use, although slightly less than the BMW.

2 Series Active Tourer @ BMW Group Press

Engine Options and Performance

When it comes to engine options, both vehicles offer competitive choices. The BMW 2er Active Tourer boasts a range of powertrains, including petrol, diesel, and hybrid formats, with power outputs ranging from 122 HP to an impressive 326 HP. This vehicle supports both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, enhancing its versatility across various driving conditions. The use of a dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures gear shifts are swift and smooth, further improving the driving experience.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc also offers a selection of petrol and diesel engines, with power outputs between 115 HP and a thrilling 300 HP from its performance-oriented version. It features both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, catering to a wide range of driving preferences. The front-wheel and all-wheel drive options provide adaptability, making the T-Roc suitable for urban commuting and off-road adventures alike.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is an essential aspect for many consumers, and both vehicles perform commendably in this area. The BMW 2er Active Tourer achieves a consumption rate as low as 4.5 L/100 km depending on the engine choice, while its hybrid models can deliver an electric range of 88 km. Its CO2 emissions also vary, boasting a maximum of 140 g/km across the range.

The VW T-Roc is no slouch either, achieving consumption rates as low as 4.7 L/100 km. While it offers a variety of engines, its emissions can peak at 166 g/km, which suggests that buyers conscious of their carbon footprint might lean towards the BMW's greener options.

2 Series Active Tourer @ BMW Group Press

Acceleration and Top Speed

Performance enthusiasts will appreciate the acceleration and top speed offerings of both models. The BMW 2er Active Tourer accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, making it a quick option in its class. Its top speed can reach up to 241 km/h, showcasing its sporty credentials.

In comparison, the VW T-Roc offers a respectable range of performance figures, with its fastest variant capable of hitting 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, and a top speed of 250 km/h. This positions the T-Roc as an exciting option for those who crave speed.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Innovations and Technology

Both vehicles come equipped with modern technology to enhance the driving experience. The BMW 2er Active Tourer features advanced driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a state-of-the-art infotainment system that seamlessly integrates with mobile devices for a connected experience.

The VW T-Roc also emphasizes technology with features such as a customizable digital cockpit, advanced navigation systems, and a suite of driver assistance features that add convenience and safety during drives. Its user-friendly interface and connectivity options ensure that drivers remain engaged and informed.

2 Series Active Tourer @ BMW Group Press

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

In the end, the decision between the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the VW T-Roc boils down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs. If you prioritize versatility, space, and hybrid technology, the BMW 2er Active Tourer is an excellent choice. Conversely, if you lean towards a sportier performance with a rugged SUV feel, the VW T-Roc could be the perfect fit. Regardless of your choice, both models represent the ongoing evolution in the automotive market, combining style, efficiency, and performance in unique ways.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £, while the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer costs 31000 £. That’s a price difference of around 4590 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer manages with 2.90 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 2.60 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer has a convincingly edge – offering 326 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 176 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs a bit better – reaching 238 km/h, while the VW T-Roc tops out at 212 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW 2 Series Active Tourer pulls convincingly stronger with 477 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 227 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Roc is slight lighter – 1465 kg compared to 1545 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers hardly perceptible more room – 475 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

In maximum load capacity, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer performs barely noticeable better – up to 1455 L, which is about 105 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc barely noticeable takes the win – 515 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £31,000
2 Series Active Tourer @ BMW Group Press

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 326 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.9 - 6.2 L
  • Electric Range : 82 km
details

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers a blend of versatility and modern design, making it an ideal choice for drivers seeking practicality without compromising on style. Its spacious interior and advanced technology features ensure a comfortable and connected driving experience. With a focus on efficiency and performance, this vehicle stands out as a refined option in the compact MPV segment.

details
P90305272_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ BMW Group Press
P90305281_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ BMW Group Press
P90288931_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ BMW Group Press
P90288939_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series @ BMW Group Press

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
VW T-Roc
2 Series Active Tourer @ BMW Group Press
T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
31000 - 48000 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 6.2 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
82 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
14.20 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 - 140 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
MPV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1545 - 1920 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
406 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4386 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1824 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1576 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1370 - 1455 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
465 - 505 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 326 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
195 - 238 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 - 240 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
BMW
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

@ BMW Group Press
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X1
VS
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is the clever, family-focused MPV that swaps SUV posturing for genuinely useful space and a lower, car‑like ride, while the BMW X1 dresses up as a compact SUV with higher seating, tougher styling and a bit more composure on rutted roads. Pick the 2 Series for easy …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and VW T-Roc both offer compelling choices for drivers seeking versatility and style. The Tucson stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it ideal for families and tech enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the T-Roc shines with its …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Corolla Cross
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota Corolla Cross and VW T-Roc showcase distinct personalities that cater to varying driver preferences. The Corolla Cross emphasizes reliability and practicality with its spacious interior and fuel-efficient hybrid options, while the T-Roc offers a …
What drive types are available for the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.