VS

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (326 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (31,500 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 2 Series Active Tourer or VW T-Roc?

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

2 Series Active Tourer

BMW 2er Active Tourer vs. VW T-Roc: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive landscape is constantly evolving, with manufacturers striving to meet consumer demands for functionality, comfort, and innovation. In this comparative analysis, we delve into two prominent models of 2024: the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the VW T-Roc. Each of these vehicles offers unique features and capabilities, appealing to different segments of the market. Let’s explore the technical specifications and innovations that set these two apart.

T-Roc

Body Type and Interior Space

Firstly, the BMW 2er Active Tourer is defined as a Multi-Purpose Vehicle (MPV), emphasizing versatility and interior space. With a length of 4,386 mm, a width of 1,824 mm, and a height of 1,576 mm, it offers ample room for passengers and luggage alike. Its trunk capacity of 470 liters means you won’t struggle to fit your essentials when on the road.

Contrastingly, the VW T-Roc is characterized as a Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV), which typically offers a more rugged aesthetic and performance. Measuring between 4,236 mm and 4,271 mm in length, and with a height variance from 1,527 mm to 1,584 mm, the T-Roc provides a sportier profile. Its trunk capacity of 445 liters ensures it is also practical for daily use, although slightly less than the BMW.

2 Series Active Tourer

Engine Options and Performance

When it comes to engine options, both vehicles offer competitive choices. The BMW 2er Active Tourer boasts a range of powertrains, including petrol, diesel, and hybrid formats, with power outputs ranging from 122 HP to an impressive 326 HP. This vehicle supports both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, enhancing its versatility across various driving conditions. The use of a dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures gear shifts are swift and smooth, further improving the driving experience.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc also offers a selection of petrol and diesel engines, with power outputs between 115 HP and a thrilling 300 HP from its performance-oriented version. It features both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, catering to a wide range of driving preferences. The front-wheel and all-wheel drive options provide adaptability, making the T-Roc suitable for urban commuting and off-road adventures alike.

T-Roc

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is an essential aspect for many consumers, and both vehicles perform commendably in this area. The BMW 2er Active Tourer achieves a consumption rate as low as 4.5 L/100 km depending on the engine choice, while its hybrid models can deliver an electric range of 88 km. Its CO2 emissions also vary, boasting a maximum of 140 g/km across the range.

The VW T-Roc is no slouch either, achieving consumption rates as low as 4.7 L/100 km. While it offers a variety of engines, its emissions can peak at 166 g/km, which suggests that buyers conscious of their carbon footprint might lean towards the BMW's greener options.

2 Series Active Tourer

Acceleration and Top Speed

Performance enthusiasts will appreciate the acceleration and top speed offerings of both models. The BMW 2er Active Tourer accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, making it a quick option in its class. Its top speed can reach up to 241 km/h, showcasing its sporty credentials.

In comparison, the VW T-Roc offers a respectable range of performance figures, with its fastest variant capable of hitting 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, and a top speed of 250 km/h. This positions the T-Roc as an exciting option for those who crave speed.

T-Roc

Innovations and Technology

Both vehicles come equipped with modern technology to enhance the driving experience. The BMW 2er Active Tourer features advanced driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a state-of-the-art infotainment system that seamlessly integrates with mobile devices for a connected experience.

The VW T-Roc also emphasizes technology with features such as a customizable digital cockpit, advanced navigation systems, and a suite of driver assistance features that add convenience and safety during drives. Its user-friendly interface and connectivity options ensure that drivers remain engaged and informed.

2 Series Active Tourer

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

In the end, the decision between the BMW 2er Active Tourer and the VW T-Roc boils down to personal preferences and lifestyle needs. If you prioritize versatility, space, and hybrid technology, the BMW 2er Active Tourer is an excellent choice. Conversely, if you lean towards a sportier performance with a rugged SUV feel, the VW T-Roc could be the perfect fit. Regardless of your choice, both models represent the ongoing evolution in the automotive market, combining style, efficiency, and performance in unique ways.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2 Series Active Tourer

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Roc is a bit cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer costs 31,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,062 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer uses 2.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer offers substantially more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 176 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer delivers clearly more torque with 477 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 227 Nm more.

2 Series Active Tourer

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is marginally lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,545 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers barely more boot space – 475 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 5 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries only slightly more – 515 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,500
2 Series Active Tourer

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 326 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.9 - 6.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 82 km
details
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer turns the family MPV into something you’d actually want to park outside a café, pairing compact practicality with surprisingly premium cabin flair. It won’t thrill like a sports car, but it drives with the composed poise you expect from the badge and keeps daily life easy and un-fussy.

details
P90305272_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series
P90305281_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series
P90288931_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series
P90288939_highRes_the-new-bmw-2-series

Reviews BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
Reucherand
16 May 2026, 19:45:01

Mild hybrid in terms of mileage. It’s an excellent car. Smooth, quiet, pleasant to drive. Petrol consumption 2.9 L/100 km. Powerful — lets you overtake quickly without taking risks. One notable drawback: the navigation isn’t as accurate as Waze and takes a long time to search for addresses.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
BMW X1
VS
The BMW 2 Series Active Tourer is the clever, family-focused MPV that swaps SUV posturing for genuinely useful space and a lower, car‑like ride, while the BMW X1 dresses up as a compact SUV with higher seating, tougher styling and a bit more composure on rutted roads. Pick the 2 Series for easy …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
CUPRA Formentor
VW T-Roc
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that balance everyday practicality with distinct personalities—one leaning sporty and style‑focused, the other aiming for broad appeal and comfort. This quick comparison highlights how the Formentor’s sharper driving character and design …
Audi A3 Sportback
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the VW T‑Roc share many Volkswagen Group underpinnings but target different buyers: the A3 Sportback focuses on refined driving dynamics and premium cabin quality, while the VW T‑Roc offers a taller, more practical crossover package at a more value-driven price. This …
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
31,500 - 48,500 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.9 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
82 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
65 - 140 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
MPV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,545 - 1,920 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
406 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,824 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
465 - 505 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 326 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 - 240 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
BMW
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the BMW 2 Series Active Tourer have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.