VS

BMW 5 Series Touring vs Skoda Kodiaq – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether BMW 5 Series Touring or Skoda Kodiaq fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

5 Series Touring @ press.bmwgroup.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kodiaq has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the BMW 5 Series Touring costs 52500 £. That’s a price difference of around 15694 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the BMW 5 Series Touring with 0.70 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 123 km, about 26 km more than the BMW 5 Series Touring.

Kodiaq @ skoda-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW 5 Series Touring has a significantly edge – offering 727 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 462 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 5 Series Touring is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.60 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the BMW 5 Series Touring performs barely noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BMW 5 Series Touring pulls significantly stronger with 1000 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm difference.

5 Series Touring @ press.bmwgroup.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is slight lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1850 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – up to 2105 L, which is about 405 L more than the BMW 5 Series Touring.

When it comes to payload, BMW 5 Series Touring a bit takes the win – 620 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the BMW 5 Series Touring shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £52,500
P90404035_highRes_the-new-bmw-530d-xdr

BMW 5 Series Touring

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 197 - 727 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.7 - 6.1 L
  • Electric Range : 66 - 97 km
details

BMW 5 Series Touring

The BMW 5 Series Touring combines elegance and practicality, offering a luxurious interior with ample luggage space, ideal for long journeys. Its sleek design and advanced technology make it a standout in its class, delivering a blend of performance and comfort. With its smooth handling and efficient engine, this vehicle is perfect for both city driving and countryside adventures.

details
P90404035_highRes_the-new-bmw-530d-xdr @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90404031_highRes_the-new-bmw-530d-xdr @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90404045_highRes_the-new-bmw-530d-xdr @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90404054_highRes_the-new-bmw-530d-xdr @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90404072_highRes_the-new-bmw-530d-xdr @ press.bmwgroup.com

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you want maximum space and minimum spend — just don’t expect leather and laser-cut precision.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and driving pep, but the Kodiaq will still win the school run.
BMW 5 Series Touring
Skoda Kodiaq
5 Series Touring
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
52500 - 125500 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 6.1 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
66 - 97 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
18.6 - 19.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
16 - 157 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1850 - 2550 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
500 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
5060 - 5096 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1900 - 1970 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1515 - 1516 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1630 - 1700 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
500 - 620 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 727 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 7.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
218 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
330 - 1000 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
145 - 535 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1995 - 4395 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a boot that could double as a small country.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing to families who prioritize comfort and adaptability. Both models offer distinct strengths, making the choice between them a matter of individual lifestyle needs and preferences.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly alternative that excels in efficiency and innovation. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands as a versatile choice with a robust engine lineup and spacious interior, delivering a reliable performance that caters to those who prioritize long-distance capability and a classic SUV feel.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 exudes Scandinavian luxury, offering cutting-edge safety features, premium interior materials, and a more refined driving experience, albeit at a higher price point.
Renault Austral
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct advantages that cater to different driver needs. The Renault Austral stands out with its sleek design and cutting-edge technology, delivering an engaging drive with efficient hybrid options. Conversely, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and robust practicality, particularly appealing for families requiring ample cargo space and versatile seating.
What drivetrain options does the BMW 5 Series Touring have?

The BMW 5 Series Touring is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.