Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
BMW 5 Series Touring vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison
Compare performance (727 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (52,500 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW 5 Series Touring or Skoda Kodiaq?
BMW 5 Series Touring vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
5 Series Touring
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the BMW 5 Series Touring costs 52,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,665 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the BMW 5 Series Touring with 2.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 24 km more than the BMW 5 Series Touring.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 5 Series Touring offers considerably more power – delivering 727 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 462 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 5 Series Touring is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW 5 Series Touring delivers considerably more torque with 1,000 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm more.
5 Series Touring
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is barely lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,850 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more boot space – 910 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.
When it comes to payload, the BMW 5 Series Touring carries only slightly more – 620 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW 5 Series Touring is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £52,500
BMW 5 Series Touring
BMW 5 Series Touring
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW 5 Series Touring
The BMW 5 Series Touring takes executive elegance and stretches it into a practical estate, marrying refined interior comfort with everyday usability. It drives with reassuring poise, offers plenty of space for luggage or a small life's worth of gear, and somehow manages to look sharper than most saloons in the car park — a compelling choice if you want luxury without surrendering practicality.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.
details
BMW 5 Series Touring
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
52,500 - 126,200 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
65 - 98 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 157 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,850 - 2,550 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 570 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,900 - 1,970 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
500 - 620 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
197 - 727 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 7.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
330 - 1,000 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
145 - 535 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,995 - 4,395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.