Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW X6 vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (625 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (83,600 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X6 or Renault Arkana?
BMW X6 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
X6
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana is significantly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the BMW X6 costs 83,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 55,114 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the BMW X6 with 7.2 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X6 offers clearly more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 482 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X6 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X6 delivers substantially more torque with 750 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 545 Nm more.
X6
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is substantially lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,240 kg. The difference is around 730 kg.
When it comes to payload, the BMW X6 carries noticeably more – 695 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 244 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BMW X6 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £83,600
BMW X6
BMW X6
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BMW X6
The BMW X6 wears its coupe-SUV looks like a tuxedo with oversized shoulders, turning everyday traffic into a catwalk whenever it glides past. It serves up sporty handling and a plush cabin with just enough practicality to keep daily life sane — perfect for buyers who crave drama without completely abandoning common sense.
details
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
BMW X6
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
83,600 - 146,400 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.2 - 12.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
188 - 288 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,240 - 2,445 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
580 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,960 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,004 - 2,019 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
1,700 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,530 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
595 - 695 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
298 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
250 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
540 - 750 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
219 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,993 - 4,395 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.