Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Atto 3 vs Hyundai Kona - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (204 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (33400 £ vs 23100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Hyundai Kona?
Atto 3
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Hyundai Kona has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 33400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10363 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the BYD Atto 3 with 16 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona performs a bit better – achieving up to 514 km, about 94 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
Kona
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a slight edge – offering 218 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs noticeable better – reaching 210 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Atto 3 pulls to a small extent stronger with 310 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Atto 3
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is evident lighter – 1370 kg compared to 1825 kg. The difference is around 455 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers slight more room – 466 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 26 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 3 performs slight better – up to 1338 L, which is about 38 L more than the Hyundai Kona.
When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona evident takes the win – 490 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 155 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
BYD Atto 3
Hyundai Kona
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £23,100
Hyundai Kona
BYD Atto 3
5 (1 Reviews)
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Hyundai Kona
5 (1 Reviews)
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
BYD Atto 3
Hyundai Kona
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 35100 £
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
420 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4455 mm
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
|
Width
1875 mm
|
Width
1825 mm
|
|
Height
1615 mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.30 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
What drive types are available for the BYD Atto 3?
The BYD Atto 3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.