VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Mazda CX-80?

BYD Atto 3 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BYD Atto 3 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 38,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,766 £.

As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 450 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers markedly more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers only slightly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is moderately lighter – 1,880 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 251 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers substantially more boot space – 490 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 232 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries slightly more – 650 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
Choosing between the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Atto 2 comes down to whether you need more range, space and performance or a smaller, more affordable city EV. The Atto 3 delivers stronger power, longer driving range and more interior room, while the Atto 2 focuses on compact dimensions, efficiency and …
BYD Atto 3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.1 (7 Reviews)
rate
Marinos manolessos
21 Jun 2026, 19:22:18

More quicker better price better equipped rwd move

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and Ford Explorer EV represent two different takes on the electric SUV — the Atto 3 is a compact, value-packed package while the Explorer EV aims at larger families with more range and performance. I’ll walk you through their real-world range, practicality, driving character and …
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Skoda Elroq brings together a tech-forward Chinese electric crossover and a more traditionally engineered European compact SUV. I’ll highlight the key differences in driving range, interior space, features and running costs so you can quickly see which one fits your …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Meet BYD's feisty duo: the Atto 3 — a cheeky, city-friendly compact crossover — takes on the Sealion 7, a sleeker, more spacious contender that aims to blend family practicality with a touch of flair. Which one wins your garage comes down to whether you crave nimble urban fun or roomy long-range …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the MG MGS6 EV helps buyers decide between BYD’s compact, tech-focused electric crossover and MG’s contender that prioritizes practicality and value. Below I’ll outline the key differences in range, performance, interior quality and equipment so you can pick the one …
BYD Atto 3
XPeng G6
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the XPeng G6 helps you decide between a compact, value-oriented electric crossover and a more tech-focused, aerodynamic SUV with stronger range and advanced driver aids. I’ll highlight how they differ in range, interior comfort, driving character and ownership costs so …
BYD Atto 3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
530 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
BYD
Brand
Mazda
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.