VS

BYD Atto 3 vs XPeng P7 comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 473 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or XPeng P7?

BYD Atto 3 vs XPeng P7: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter

XPeng P7

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • slightly more electric range

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BYD Atto 3 is visibly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the XPeng P7 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,094 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the BYD Atto 3 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16 kWh/100km compared to 16.8 kWh/100km for the XPeng P7. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the XPeng P7 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 66 km more than the BYD Atto 3.

P7

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the XPeng P7 offers very slightly more power – delivering 473 HP compared to 449 HP. That’s roughly 24 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the XPeng P7 takes 4.1 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the XPeng P7 is somewhat faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng P7 delivers clearly more torque with 757 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 197 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is slightly lighter – 1,825 kg compared to 2,020 kg. The difference is around 195 kg.

Boot capacity is identical – both offer 440 L of storage.

When it comes to payload, the XPeng P7 carries markedly more – 430 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The XPeng P7 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,500
P7

XPeng P7

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 276 - 473 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 505 - 576 km
BYD Atto 3
XPeng P7

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.

details

XPeng P7

The XPeng P7 cuts a sleek, coupe-like silhouette that looks like a tech firm's idea of a stylish electric sedan, and its minimalist cabin packs smart screens and handy features that actually improve everyday life. Underneath the future-facing image it drives with surprising poise and comes loaded with advanced driver aids, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want electric charisma without the hype.

details
BYD Atto 3
XPeng P7

Costs and Consumption

Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
Price
42,500 - 50,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.8 - 19.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
Electric Range
505 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
82.7 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,825 kg
Curb weight
2,020 - 2,140 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
440 L
Length
4,455 mm
Length
4,888 mm
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,896 mm
Height
1,615 mm
Height
1,450 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
335 kg
Payload
430 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
Power HP
276 - 473 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
Torque
440 - 757 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
Power kW
203 - 348 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
XPeng
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.