Compare performance (324 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (34,300 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Seal U or GWM WEY 03?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive market is rapidly evolving, particularly with the rise of electric and hybrid vehicles. In this comparison, we explore two standout models: the BYD Seal U and the GWM WEY 03. Both vehicles demonstrate significant advancements in technology, performance, and design, appealing to a growing consumer base interested in eco-friendly options.
The BYD Seal U offers a choice between a plugin hybrid and an electric drivetrain, delivering a power range from 218 HP to an impressive 324 HP. The Seal U boasts a maximum torque of 330 Nm for the hybrid model and up to 550 Nm for the electric version, illustrating its robust performance across various terrains. With a 0-100 km/h acceleration time as low as 5.9 seconds, the Seal U is designed for those who enjoy spirited driving.
In contrast, the GWM WEY 03 focuses on a plugin hybrid setup that can produce up to 442 HP. This model features a remarkable torque output of 685 Nm, allowing the vehicle to dash from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.3 seconds. With such high power ratings, the WEY 03 not only matches but can outperform many conventional SUVs in its class.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the BYD Seal U stands out with a consumption rating of just 0.9 L/100km for its hybrid variant. Meanwhile, the electric version has an electric consumption of 19.9 kWh/100km, allowing for a substantial electric range of around 420 km. The Seal U has a CO2 emission rating between 0 g/km to a maximum of 26 g/km, depending on the model configuration.
The GWM WEY 03 also showcases impressive efficiency figures, with a consumption of only 0.5 L/100km and an electric range of up to 139 km. This model releases just 15 g/km of CO2, ensuring it aligns with modern environmental standards. Overall, both vehicles demonstrate a commitment to reducing their ecological footprint.
For those requiring ample space, the GWM WEY 03 presents a generous trunk capacity of 517 liters and a height of 1730 mm, providing roominess and comfort for passengers and cargo alike. The WEY 03 measures 4688 mm in length and 1890 mm in width, making it a compact SUV that does not compromise on space.
By comparison, the BYD Seal U is slightly longer at 4775 mm and shares the same width of 1890 mm. With a trunk capacity of 425 to 552 liters depending on the configuration, it offers adaptable space, catering to various storage needs.
The BYD Seal U incorporates cutting-edge technology such as advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and a digital cockpit designed for seamless connectivity. Its multiple driving modes, including an all-wheel-drive option, ensure versatility across diverse driving conditions.
On the other hand, the GWM WEY 03 excels with features like an intuitive infotainment system, offering enhanced connectivity options and smart navigation functionalities. The innovative DCT automatic transmission provides smooth gear transitions that enhance the overall driving experience.
Choosing between the BYD Seal U and the GWM WEY 03 ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. The BYD Seal U excels in a balanced offering of eco-friendliness and practical performance while providing superb efficiency figures. Meanwhile, the GWM WEY 03 appeals to those seeking exhilarating performance coupled with hybrid technology. Both models exhibit advancements in innovation and design, showcasing the promising direction of the automotive industry.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Seal U is moderately cheaper – starting at 34,300 £ , while the GWM WEY 03 costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,780 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Seal U offers considerably more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 361 km more than the GWM WEY 03.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM WEY 03 offers visibly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 324 HP. That’s roughly 118 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM WEY 03 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the BYD Seal U takes 5.9 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM WEY 03 delivers slightly more torque with 685 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Seal U is somewhat lighter – 1,940 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 235 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BYD Seal U offers barely more boot space – 552 L compared to 517 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Seal U carries marginally more – 410 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
The BYD Seal U is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Seal U pairs a sleek fastback silhouette with a surprisingly roomy, tech-rich cabin, giving electric chic without the showroom pretension. It's a smart pick for buyers after confident handling, sensible practicality and standout value — all wrapped up with a cheeky grin when you put your foot down.
details
The WEY 03 cuts a striking figure with sharp, futuristic styling and an interior that punches above its weight for premium feel and tech. For buyers after distinctive looks, a comfy cabin and confident handling without the same badge drama, it’s a compelling alternative that also adds a dash of personality to everyday driving.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,300 - 39,800 £
|
Price
41,100 - 47,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.1 - 20.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
70 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
130 - 139 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 71 g/km
|
co2
15 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,940 - 2,147 kg
|
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,295 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
425 - 552 L
|
Trunk capacity
517 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
410 kg
|
Payload
375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
218 - 324 HP
|
Power HP
367 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 685 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
160 - 238 kW
|
Power kW
270 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
GWM
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España