VS

BYD Tang vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: BYD Tang or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £. That’s a price difference of around 27437 £.

As for range, the BYD Tang performs convincingly better – achieving up to 530 km, about 407 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a convincingly edge – offering 517 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 252 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slightly better – reaching 231 km/h, while the BYD Tang tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 41 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Tang pulls significantly stronger with 680 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: BYD Tang offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is convincingly lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2630 kg. The difference is around 946 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 675 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – up to 2105 L, which is about 450 L more than the BYD Tang.

When it comes to payload, BYD Tang hardly perceptible takes the win – 575 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race?

The BYD Tang proves to be shows small but notable strengths and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BYD Tang is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

about £64,285
8ee4e329-3f72-45c5-9cb4-b63b5ddb555e

BYD Tang

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 517 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 24 kWh
  • Electric Range : 530 km
details

BYD Tang

The BYD Tang represents a bold entry into the competitive SUV market, blending cutting-edge technology with modern design aesthetics. Its spacious interior is complemented by high-quality materials and innovative features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. With an emphasis on sustainability, the Tang offers an eco-friendly driving experience without compromising on performance or luxury.

details
8ee4e329-3f72-45c5-9cb4-b63b5ddb555e @ press.bydauto.be
de335338-ec26-419d-842a-9f53ec65c2c6 @ press.bydauto.be
9fcec901-74bd-4e0f-8761-2897e2f597bf @ press.bydauto.be
24737df2-4e98-4799-b7e2-d4d5c2437265 @ press.bydauto.be
c342d66a-80aa-4960-abc4-26de29271816 @ press.bydauto.be

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the competitive SUV landscape, the Skoda Kodiaq and Dacia Bigster offer distinct advantages for buyers seeking practicality and value. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, making it a top choice for families. In contrast, the Bigster appeals to budget-conscious consumers with its robust design and functionality, proving that affordability doesn't have to compromise style or capability.
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLB and Skoda Kodiaq stand out for their unique blend of luxury and practicality. While the GLB boasts a premium interior and advanced technology features, the Kodiaq excels in space and functionality, making it a family-friendly choice. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preferences, whether it's the opulence of the GLB or the value and versatility of the Kodiaq.
BYD Tang
Skoda Kodiaq
Tang
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
64300 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
530 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2630 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
235 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4970 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1955 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1745 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1655 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
575 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
517 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
190 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
680 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
380 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
BYD
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its spacious interior and family-friendly features, making it a top choice for those prioritizing comfort and practicality. On the other hand, the VW Tayron impresses with its stylish design and refined driving dynamics, appealing to those seeking a more premium experience. While both models share a common platform, their distinct personalities cater to different driver preferences, making this comparison essential for prospective buyers.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly alternative that excels in efficiency and innovation. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands as a versatile choice with a robust engine lineup and spacious interior, delivering a reliable performance that caters to those who prioritize long-distance capability and a classic SUV feel.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium driving experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two models will hinge on whether buyers prioritize functionality or sophisticated comfort.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 exudes Scandinavian luxury, offering cutting-edge safety features, premium interior materials, and a more refined driving experience, albeit at a higher price point.
BYD Tang
XPeng G9
VS
The BYD Tang and XPeng G9 are two compelling contenders in the growing electric SUV market, each offering unique features and striking designs. The Tang impresses with its spacious interior and robust battery range, making it a practical choice for families on the go. Meanwhile, the G9 stands out for its advanced tech features and innovative user interface, appealing to tech-savvy drivers looking for a connected driving experience.
Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Tang is available as All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.