VS

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (22,100 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Berlingo Transporter or Mazda CX-6e?

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

  • clearly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
  • considerably more trunk space

Mazda CX-6e

  • substantially more power
  • noticeably more electric range

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Berlingo Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen Berlingo Transporter is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,714 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter is only slightly more efficient: consuming 17.4 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 484 km, about 130 km more than the Citroen Berlingo Transporter.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-6e offers substantially more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Berlingo Transporter delivers barely more torque with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Berlingo Transporter is considerably lighter – 1,329 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 876 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter offers considerably more boot space – 1,800 L compared to 468 L. That’s a difference of about 1,332 L.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter carries significantly more – 991 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 606 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen Berlingo Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,100
Berlingo Transporter

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 354 km
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

The Citroën Berlingo is a no-nonsense work van that pairs cavernous practicality with a surprisingly comfy, car-like driving experience. It won’t pretend to be sporty, but it will swallow your cargo, simplify your day, and keep ownership headaches to a minimum with sensible packaging and clever storage.

details

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

Price
22,100 - 33,800 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
354 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
46 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 143 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
53 - 61 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,329 - 1,813 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
1,800 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
4,401 - 4,751 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
1,796 - 1,812 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,000 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
611 - 991 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.