Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Citroen C4 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison
Compare performance (156 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C4 or Skoda Kodiaq?
Citroen C4 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
C4
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Citroen C4 is clearly cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,186 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Citroen C4 with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C4 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 427 km, about 305 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Citroen C4 takes 8 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
C4
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C4 is clearly lighter – 1,403 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 281 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 400 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries clearly more – 563 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 157 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Citroen C4
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Citroen C4
Citroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.
details
Citroen C4
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,700 - 32,200 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,652 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.