VS

Citroen C5 Aircross vs Hyundai Kona – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C5 Aircross or Hyundai Kona?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C5 Aircross @ media.stellantis.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Kona has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Citroen C5 Aircross costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 6077 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Citroen C5 Aircross manages with 2.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.60 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s slightly more efficient than the Citroen C5 Aircross with 17 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.40 kWh.

As for range, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 520 km, about 6 km more than the Hyundai Kona.

Kona @ hyundai.news

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a barely noticeable edge – offering 218 HP compared to 210 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Citroen C5 Aircross takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs barely noticeable better – reaching 220 km/h, while the Hyundai Kona tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Citroen C5 Aircross pulls slightly stronger with 300 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.

C5 Aircross @ media.stellantis.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is slightly lighter – 1370 kg compared to 1629 kg. The difference is around 259 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Citroen C5 Aircross offers to a small extent more room – 565 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 99 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Citroen C5 Aircross performs distinct better – up to 1668 L, which is about 368 L more than the Hyundai Kona.

When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona barely noticeable takes the win – 490 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Citroen C5 Aircross shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £29,100
a9203463-62b0a96fb4625

Citroen C5 Aircross

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 145 - 210 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.5 - 5.4 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 kWh
  • Electric Range : 81 - 520 km
details

Citroen C5 Aircross

The Citroen C5 Aircross stands out in the SUV market with its distinctively bold design and emphasis on comfort. Its interior is thoughtfully crafted, providing spaciousness and a plethora of features that cater to passenger convenience and enjoyment. With its smooth ride and refined driving dynamics, it offers a relaxing experience for both city commutes and long-distance journeys.

details
a9203463-62b0a96fb4625 @ media.stellantis.com
a9203203-62b0a97459d8e @ media.stellantis.com
a9201305-62b0a98f68101 @ media.stellantis.com
citroenc5aircrosshybrid225069-62b0a8a3075bb @ media.stellantis.com

Hyundai Kona

5 (1)
rate

The Hyundai Kona blends a bold design with a versatile interior, making it a standout choice in the compact SUV market. Its crisp handling and responsive steering provide an engaging driving experience, whether in the city or on the open road. The vehicle also offers a range of features designed to enhance comfort and connectivity, ensuring a pleasurable journey for both driver and passengers.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg @ hyundai.news
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg @ hyundai.news
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg @ hyundai.news
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg @ hyundai.news

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you want character and driving fizz, pick the Kona; if low running costs and unshakable dependability top your list, the Yaris Cross is the clever, unflashy winner.
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona each offer distinct advantages tailored to different driver preferences. The Bayon impresses with its sleek urban design and efficient use of space, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the Kona stands out with its sporty styling and dynamic performance, attracting those who crave a more adventurous driving experience.
Citroen C5 Aircross
Hyundai Kona
C5 Aircross
Kona

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 41600 £
Price
23100 - 41600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
17 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range
81 - 520 km
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Battery Capacity
17.8 - 73 kWh
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
co2
0 - 121 g/km
co2
0 - 163 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1629 - 2184 kg
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
Trunk capacity
565 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4650 mm
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
Width
1870 mm
Width
1825 mm
Height
1695 mm
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
Max trunk capacity
1668 L
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
Payload
446 - 471 kg
Payload
420 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
145 - 210 HP
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Max Speed
170 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
Torque
230 - 300 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Hyundai

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai Kona
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
When comparing the Hyundai Kona and the Opel Frontera, drivers will find a stark contrast in design and driving dynamics. The Kona excels with its modern styling and advanced technology, making it a compelling choice for urban commuters. On the other hand, the Frontera's rugged build and off-road capability cater to adventure seekers looking for a reliable SUV that can handle rough terrain.
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Skoda Elroq stand out with their distinct design and performance capabilities. The Kona impresses with its dynamic styling and tech-forward interior, appealing to younger buyers, while the Elroq offers a spacious cabin and practical features that cater to families. Both models deliver excellent efficiency, but the choice between them ultimately hinges on personal preference for aesthetics and utility.
Hyundai Kona
VW ID.3
VS
In the electrified showdown between the Hyundai Kona Electric and the Volkswagen ID.3, both cars bring distinct advantages to the table. The Kona Electric shines with its impressive range and affordability, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious consumers seeking long-distance capabilities. On the other hand, the VW ID.3 offers a more premium feel and an innovative design, potentially appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and cutting-edge technology in their eco-friendly ride.
Citroen C5 Aircross
Dacia Duster
VS
In the battle of practicality and comfort, the Citroën C5 Aircross takes the edge with its plush interior and advanced suspension system, providing a smooth ride even on rough terrain. However, the Dacia Duster stands out for its affordability and rugged charm, making it an excellent choice for budget-conscious buyers who still crave adventure. Ultimately, the decision between these two SUVs hinges on whether you prioritize comfort or cost.
Hyundai i20
Hyundai Kona
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Hyundai i20 and Hyundai Kona cater to different driving experiences, yet both deliver exceptional value. The Hyundai i20 shines with its compact design and fuel efficiency, making it an ideal city car, while the Hyundai Kona offers a more robust and versatile ride, perfect for those seeking a compact SUV with a touch of adventure. Both models boast advanced tech features and stylish designs, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you prioritize agility and economy or versatility and higher ground clearance.
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV6 stand out in the rapidly expanding electric SUV market, each offering unique strengths tailored to different driver preferences. The Kona impresses with its compact design and nimble handling, making it a great choice for urban environments, while the EV6 boasts a more spacious interior and cutting-edge technology geared towards long-distance travel. Ultimately, whether you prioritize versatility or luxury, both models present compelling options for eco-conscious consumers looking for style and performance.
Citroen C5 Aircross
Vauxhall Grandland
VS
When comparing the Citroen C5 Aircross to the Vauxhall Grandland, both SUVs offer distinct advantages in terms of comfort and practicality. The Citroen C5 Aircross stands out with its unique suspension system and plush seating, providing a highly comfortable ride that is well-suited for long journeys. Meanwhile, the Vauxhall Grandland appeals with its sporty design and efficient engines, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a dynamic driving experience without compromising on space.
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced technology features, offering drivers a dynamic and engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz takes a more futuristic approach, emphasizing sustainability and autonomous driving capabilities, making it a symbol of the brand's vision for the future of mobility. While the Kona appeals to enthusiasts seeking a stylish and versatile vehicle, the Symbioz captivates with its innovative concepts that challenge conventional automotive norms.
What drive types are available for the Citroen C5 Aircross?

The Citroen C5 Aircross is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.