Compare performance (279 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (55,100 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumper or Mazda CX-80?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-80 is moderately cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Citroen Jumper costs 55,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,752 £.
As for electric range, the Citroen Jumper offers substantially more range – reaching up to 424 km, about 364 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 279 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 410 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is noticeably lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,865 kg. The difference is around 734 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumper carries clearly more – 1,385 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 735 kg.
The Citroen Jumper is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroen Jumper is a no-nonsense workhorse that swaps flash for sheer practicality, with a spacious load area and composed, user-friendly driving manners that make busy workdays easier. It won’t win any beauty contests, but its sensible packaging, comfortable cab and wallet-friendly running make it a compelling choice for tradespeople and small businesses.
details
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,100 - 57,800 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
424 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,865 - 2,940 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,050 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
560 - 1,385 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
279 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
410 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
205 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Mazda
|