VS

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Jeep Avenger comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (32,100 £ vs 22,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Jumpy Transporter or Jeep Avenger?

Citroen Jumpy Transporter vs Jeep Avenger: Key differences

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

  • slightly more power
details

Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jumpy Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Jeep Avenger is clearly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter costs 32,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,588 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

In terms of energy consumption, the Jeep Avenger is clearly more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Citroen Jumpy Transporter. That’s a difference of about 8.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Jeep Avenger offers slightly more range – reaching up to 400 km, about 72 km more than the Citroen Jumpy Transporter.

Avenger

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers slightly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 24 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Avenger is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Citroen Jumpy Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Jumpy Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Citroen Jumpy Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is considerably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,722 kg. The difference is around 542 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Jumpy Transporter carries substantially more – 1,226 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 724 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Avenger has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,500
Avenger

Jeep Avenger

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manual
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 100 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 400 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen Jumpy Transporter

The Citroën Dispatch is a steady, no-nonsense transporter that swallows workday demands with quiet confidence while keeping drivers comfortable on long runs. Practical, economical and unfussy, it’s the kind of van that won’t steal the show but will make sure your business runs smoother — and that’s often exactly what you want.

details
serpimg_bc6Rnt

Reviews Citroen Jumpy Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.2 (10 Reviews)
rate
Feedback tends to portray the Avenger as an attractive, city-friendly small SUV with smooth, efficient powertrains and generally agile urban manners. Owners often praise its fuel economy, responsive automatic gearing and pleasant driving feel, while typical negatives frequently mention inconsistent fit-and-finish, recurring electronic/display glitches and relatively narrow seats or limited cabin space. Opinions are somewhat mixed — several owners report trouble-free mechanical use, so buyers should weigh the appealing driving characteristics against the reported quality and electronics concerns.
Kurt
2 Jul 2026, 03:11:44

Ideal size — used only as a 2-seater.
Price acceptable —
Parking and handling — senior-friendly — controls also without touchscreen — buttons and knobs

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Jeep Avenger
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The all‑electric Jeep Avenger packs Jeep’s chunky styling into a city‑friendly crossover with brisk EV torque and cheeky off‑road looks — perfect for buyers who want electric motoring with attitude, even if it’s more boulevard than boulder. The Toyota Yaris Cross, meanwhile, swaps glamour for …
Jeep Avenger
MG ZS
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the MG ZS both aim at buyers wanting a small, practical SUV but take very different approaches. The Avenger is a compact, city-friendly Jeep with an electric drivetrain and rugged styling, while the MG ZS is a budget-focused small SUV offering spacious practicality and a choice …
Fiat 600
Jeep Avenger
VS
Deciding between the Fiat 600 and the Jeep Avenger comes down to whether you prefer a compact, city-focused car with Italian flair or a small crossover that offers higher ground clearance and a more rugged image. This comparison will look at space, efficiency, driving feel, safety and running costs …
Jeep Avenger
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara are two compact SUVs that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with some crossover capability — the Avenger emphasizes modern design and electrified options, while the Vitara leans on proven practicality and value. This short comparison …
Jeep Avenger
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Jeep Avenger stands out with its rugged styling and off-road capabilities, appealing to adventure enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross offers a more refined approach with its sleek design and practical interior, making it an ideal choice for urban …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Dacia Duster
Jeep Avenger
VS
In the recent showdown between the Dacia Duster and the Jeep Avenger, both compact SUVs demonstrate their unique strengths. The Duster impresses with its affordability and practicality, making it a top choice for budget-conscious buyers seeking reliability and space. Meanwhile, the Jeep Avenger …
Citroen Jumpy Transporter
Jeep Avenger

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,100 - 52,000 £
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
222 - 328 km
Electric Range
400 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 199 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,188 kg
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,776 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
881 - 1,226 kg
Payload
490 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Jeep
What drivetrain options does the Citroen Jumpy Transporter have?

The Citroen Jumpy Transporter is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.