Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
CUPRA Ateca vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (300 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (37300 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Ateca or Skoda Kodiaq?
Ateca
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kodiaq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the CUPRA Ateca costs 37300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 420 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the CUPRA Ateca with 6.70 L. The difference is about 5.20 L per 100 km.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Ateca has a to a small extent edge – offering 300 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Ateca is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – reaching 231 km/h, while the CUPRA Ateca tops out at 199 km/h. The difference is around 32 km/h.
Both models offer the same torque – 400 Nm.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Ateca
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, CUPRA Ateca is somewhat lighter – 1418 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 266 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more room – 910 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 400 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2105 L, which is about 501 L more than the CUPRA Ateca.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq slight takes the win – 563 kg compared to 522 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
CUPRA Ateca
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
CUPRA Ateca
The CUPRA Ateca mixes SUV practicality with a seriously sporty attitude, wrapped in aggressive styling and a cockpit that looks like it belongs on a racetrack. It's the kind of car that handles daily life with composure while slipping a grin across your face every time you push it—perfect for drivers who want a practical companion that never apologizes for having fun.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
CUPRA Ateca
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37300 - 51200 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 9.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
152 - 207 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1418 - 1628 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
485 - 510 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4394 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1841 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1601 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1604 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
502 - 522 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
199 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Ateca?
The CUPRA Ateca is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.