VS

CUPRA Terramar vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Renault Arkana?

CUPRA Terramar vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

CUPRA Terramar

4.9 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Terramar

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,525 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the CUPRA Terramar uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar offers considerably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the CUPRA Terramar delivers clearly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 195 Nm more.

Terramar

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is marginally lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,638 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries moderately more – 542 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The CUPRA Terramar holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,000
Terramar

CUPRA Terramar

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range 118 km
details

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Choosing between the Cupra Formentor and the Cupra Terramar means deciding whether you want a sporting, head-turning compact crossover or a more conventional compact SUV that leans toward comfort and space. The Formentor emphasizes sharper handling, bold styling and a driver-focused feel, while the …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …
CUPRA Terramar
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Terramar

The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.

details
IMG_0231
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_07_HQ
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_13_HQ

Reviews CUPRA Terramar

4.9 (8 Reviews)
rate
Marcin
4 Jun 2026, 13:13:44

My impressions are based on only a three-day test drive, and they are excellent. The test drive "convinced" me to buy the Cupra Terramar, and I am currently waiting for the model I ordered.

Lawrence
27 May 2026, 23:26:12

Test drove both, Terramar is more liveable for a family as more practical with larger interior space and feels more premium overall. The Formentor in VZ form is super fast and agile and great fun to drive, but feels less premium all round. I also think the Terramar looks nicer inside and out.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
David Burrell
21 Jan 2026, 22:24:34

Had a Terramar for nearly 12 months and it’s proven a great choice. Love the driving experience and that fact it’s less common than Tiguan/Q3 cousins. V2 spec gives you so much kit you don’t need any extras.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
13 Jan 2026, 21:59:07

A better-equipped version of a car that's technically very similar to the Q3, offered at a more attractive price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
CUPRA Terramar
Hyundai Tucson
VS
CUPRA Terramar dials up the drama with razor-sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a design that shouts performance — it's the hot-hatch of the SUV world for drivers who actually enjoy twisty roads. The Hyundai Tucson, by contrast, is a sensible all‑rounder: spacious, comfortable and economical, …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
BMW X1
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the BMW X1 stands out with its premium interior and agile handling, delivering an engaging driving experience that enthusiasts appreciate. On the other hand, the CUPRA Terramar impresses with its bold design and sporty performance, appealing to those who crave …
CUPRA Terramar
VW Tiguan
VS
The CUPRA Terramar and the Tiguan share roots but aim at different buyers: the Terramar targets sporty, performance-minded drivers while the Tiguan focuses on practicality and family-friendly comfort. This comparison highlights how they differ in driving character, interior space and equipment, …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
CUPRA Terramar
Kia Sportage
VS
The CUPRA Terramar attacks the compact-SUV class with sharp handling, brash styling and a sporty, premium edge, while the Kia Sportage plays the sensible rival—roomier, friendlier on the wallet and loaded with mainstream tech. If you want driver-focused thrills and a head-turning look pick the …
CUPRA Terramar
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,000 - 51,100 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
36 - 191 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,869 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
512 - 542 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Renault
Is the CUPRA Terramar offered with different drivetrains?

The CUPRA Terramar is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.