VS

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (1,050 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (420,000 £ vs 58,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster or Volvo XC60?

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

849 Testarossa Roadster

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Volvo XC60 is significantly cheaper – starting at 58,300 £ , while the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster costs 420,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 361,723 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster with 9.5 L/100km. The difference is about 7.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 79 km, about 58 km more than the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster offers clearly more power – delivering 1,050 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 644 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.3 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo XC60 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster is somewhat lighter – 1,860 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 290 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries substantially more – 510 kg compared to 220 kg. That’s a difference of about 290 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

The Ferrari Testarossa Roadster strips the classic wedge-shaped drama down to open-top glamour, ensuring you arrive with presence and a grin. Behind the wheel it delivers a theatrical soundtrack and analogue charisma that will reward collectors and spirited drivers alike.

details
serpimg_Wp6wLc

Reviews Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
Deciding between the BMW X1 and the Volvo XC60 is essentially a choice between a sportier, more driver-focused compact SUV and a roomier, comfort-and-safety-oriented mid‑size contender. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving dynamics, fuel economy and running costs to help you pick the …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
VS
Comparing the Nissan Qashqai and the Volvo XC60 pits a practical, value-focused compact crossover against a more premium, comfort- and safety-oriented compact SUV. If you prioritize everyday efficiency and sensible running costs the Qashqai is a smart, budget-friendly choice, while the XC60 suits …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
The Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 are two of the top contenders in the compact luxury SUV class, each bringing a distinct take on comfort, technology and driving dynamics. If you prioritize sporty refinement and a plush, tech-forward cabin the GLC is a strong choice; if you value Scandinavian design, …
Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
420,000 £
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Consumption L/100km
9.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
21 km
Electric Range
79 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
216 g/km
co2
59 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Roadster
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,860 kg
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
74 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,999 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
220 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
1,050 HP
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
772 kW
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
3,990 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ferrari
Brand
Volvo
Is the Ferrari 849 Testarossa Roadster offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.