Compare performance (156 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat 600 or Ford Puma?
When it comes to compact SUVs, the market is crowded, but few vehicles stand out quite like the latest offerings from Fiat and Ford. The 2024 Fiat 600 and the 2025 Ford Puma both bring fresh innovations to the table, making it a tantalizing choice for automobile enthusiasts. Let's dive into a detailed comparison of these two automotive titans to see which one deserves a place in your garage.
The Fiat 600 offers multiple power options, including a dual petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV) and two electric drivetrain versions. With horsepower ranging from 100 to 156 HP, and torque peaking at 260 Nm, the Fiat 600 promises lively performance, particularly for city commuters looking for efficiency and agility. Its acceleration figures range from 10.5 to an impressive 8.5 seconds for the electric variant reaching 100 km/h. Boasting a maximum speed between 150 to 200 km/h, this model is well-equipped for highway driving.
On the other side, the Ford Puma also showcases a dual power approach with petrol MHEV and electric engines. It offers a dynamic power range of 125 to 168 HP and a substantial torque reaching up to 290 Nm, ensuring satisfying acceleration from 9.8 to a sporty 7.4 seconds to 100 km/h. While offering a slightly wider upper speed limit of up to 210 km/h, the Puma provides a bit more exhilaration on open roads.
When focusing on fuel efficiency, the Fiat 600 showcases impressive figures with a petrol consumption of 4.8 L/100km. Its electric version, featuring a 51 kWh battery, offers a robust electric range of 409 km. This makes the Fiat 600 a strong contender for eco-conscious drivers.
Ford Puma's petrol variants consume between 5.4 and 6.0 L/100km, while its electric version, featuring a 43 kWh battery, covers up to 376 km on a single charge. Though slightly less efficient in electric mode, the Puma offers a commendable balance between performance and sustainability.
Examining the practicality, the Fiat 600 measures 4178 mm in length and offers a trunk capacity of 385 liters, which expands to 360 liters in electric variants. It is tailored for urban environments with a curb weight ranging from 1355 to 1595 kg.
In contrast, the Ford Puma varies in length, peaking at 4226 mm, with a significantly larger trunk space at 523 liters. Its robust build accommodates urban and countryside driving, with a curb weight ranging from 1316 to 1563 kg.
The Fiat 600 focuses on innovation with its automatic transmission available in both dual-clutch and reduction gearbox for the electric variant. Front-wheel-drive configuration ensures easy handling, especially suited for city driving. Interior technology keeps passengers entertained and informed, catering to modern connectivity needs.
Ford Puma doesn’t lag in innovation, offering a choice of manual and automatic transmissions, with a dual-clutch gearbox available. Known for its driving dynamics, the Puma combines technology and comfort, ensuring a pleasurable driving experience.
Ultimately, the choice between the Fiat 600 and the Ford Puma hinges on personal priorities. Fiat offers compelling fuel efficiency and urban practicality, while Ford leans towards performance enthusiasts with ample cargo space and driving excitement. Both models are carving a niche in the compact SUV segment, leaving potential buyers with no wrong choice in this automotive duel.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Fiat 600 is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,066 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat 600 uses 4.8 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the Fiat 600. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 8 km more than the Fiat 600.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Fiat 600 takes 8.5 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is barely lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,355 kg. The difference is around 39 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries only slightly more – 469 kg compared to 430 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
The Ford Puma comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Fiat 600 is small, cheeky and utterly charming, a pocket-sized Italian that packs more personality than its size suggests. Ideal for city buyers who want fuss-free motoring with a playful driving character, it puts smiles ahead of spreadsheets.
details
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 31,300 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
409 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
52 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 109 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,355 - 1,595 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
360 - 385 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,178 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,779 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,523 - 1,525 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,231 - 1,256 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
427 - 430 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España