Compare performance (95 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (16,800 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van or Ford Transit Transporter?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 50,530 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers substantially more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 174 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers substantially more torque with 430 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 2.
The Ford Transit Transporter comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Fiat Qubo van is a compact urban workhorse that hides an impressively practical load area behind deceptively small proportions, making tight city streets and parking a breeze. It’s not flashy, but its sensible layout, easy-to-live-with character and wallet-friendly running make it a solid pick for anyone needing dependable everyday practicality without fuss.
details
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
16,800 - 17,100 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
133 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
3
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,285 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
3,957 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,716 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
1,721 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
535 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
80 - 95 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
59 - 70 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,248 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2016
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
Ford
|